期刊文献+

术中非计划事件对于微创食管癌根治术患者术后早期康复的影响 被引量:1

Impact of unplanned events during minimally invasive esophagectomy on early postoperative recovery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨术中非计划事件发生对于微创食管癌根治术(MIE)患者术后早期康复的影响.方法回顾性分析上海交通大学附属胸科医院2011年1月至2015年12月单-手术组连续收治的303例MIE患者的临床资料,根据患者术中有无发生非计划事件分为非计划事件组(UG组,85例)和无非计划事件组(PG组,218例),比较两组患者术后并发症发生率的差异.结果(1)MIE术中非计划事件(89例次)以胸腔和(或)腹腔粘连(28/89,31.5%)、术中意外发现肿瘤外侵明显(sT4a+T4b,25/89,28.1%)最为多见.(2)UG组患者术后呼吸系统并发症(57.6%)和神经系统并发症(10.6%)、感染(32.9%)和乳糜胸(8.2%)发生率均显著高于PG组(8.3%、2.8%、5.0%和0.9%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.138、8.026、10.336、8.325,均P〈0.05).(3)中转开胸或开腹最常见原因为胸腔和(或)腹腔粘连(9/38,23.7%),以及损伤血管大出血(7/38,18.4%).(4)非根治性切除最常见原因为肿瘤侵犯气管和(或)总支气管(7/21,33.3%)及主动脉(5/21,23.8%).结论术中非计划事件的发生增加了MIE术后并发症的发生率.随着学习曲线的延长,术中非计划事件发生率会明显下降;术前对原发肿瘤和转移淋巴结的准确分期有助于降低MIE术中非计划事件的发生. Objective To investigate the impact of unplanned events during minimally invasive esophagectomy(MIE) on early postoperative recovery. Methods The clinical data of 303 consecutive patients undergoing MIE by the same operation group in Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University between January 2011 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into unplanned group(85 cases) and planned group(218 cases) based on the presence and absence of unplanned events during operation, and the incidences of postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Results ( 1 ) The most common unplanned events during MIE were pleural or/and peritoneal adhesion (28/89, 31. 5%). Intraoperative accidental discovery of deep tumor invasion (sT4a + T4b) ranked second (25/89, 28. 1%) . (2 ) The incidences of respiratory system complications (57.6%), nervous system complications (10.6%), postoperative infection (32.9%)and chylothorax (8.2%) in unplanned group were significantly higher than those in planned group(8.3% , 2.8%, 5.0%, 0.9%, respectively) = 12.138, 8.02 6,10.336, 8.325,respectively; P 〈0 . 0 5 ) . ( 3) The most common reasons for transference from MIE to thoracotomy or laparotomy were pleural/peritoneal adhesion (9/38,23. 7%) and bleeding ( 7/38, 18.4%). (4) The main reasons for R2 resection were tumor invasions of trachea/bronchus (7/21, 33.3%) and aorta(5/21, 23.8%).Conclusions The unplanned events during MIE increases the incidence of postoperative complications. With the increase in experience for MIE, unplanned events will decrease. Preoperative accurate clinical TNM staging can reduce the incidence of unplanned events during MIE.
出处 《中华胸部外科电子杂志》 2016年第4期199-203,共5页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF THORACIC SURGERY:Electronic Edition
关键词 微创食管癌根治术 非计划事件 并发症 Minimally invasive esophagectomy Unplanned events Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc, 2010,24(7) : 1621-1629.
  • 2Miller JD, Jain MK, de Gara CJ, et al. Effect of surgical experience on results of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol, 1997,65 ( 1 ) : 20-21.
  • 3Rice TW, Blackstone EH, Rusch VW. 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual : esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010,17(7) : 1721-1724.
  • 4Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc, 2003,17(3):515-519.
  • 5Song SY, Na K J, Oh SG, et al. Learning curves of minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2009,35 (4) : 689-693.
  • 6Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir, 2009,64(2) : 135-146.
  • 7Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, et al. Open transthoracic transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival. Surg Endosc, 2006,20( 11 ) : 1681-1686.
  • 8Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, et al. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg, 2012,255(2) : 197-203.
  • 9Ben-David K, Rossidis G, Zloteeki RA, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and effective following neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18 (12) : 3324-3329.
  • 10Urschel JD, Vasan H, Blewett CJ. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer. Am J Surg, 2002, 183(3) : 274-279.

共引文献30

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部