期刊文献+

新型末端可弯3D腹腔镜肾脏部分切除术的疗效评估 被引量:2

Effectiveness Assessment of Partial Nephrectomy with Flexible Three-dimensional Laparoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨新型末端可弯3D腹腔镜进行肾部分切除术的有效性和安全性。方法 2014年12月至2015年12月,29例肾肿瘤患者在北京协和医院接受了末端可弯3D腹腔镜肾部分切除术,男性18例,女性11例,年龄37~65岁,肿瘤直径2.2~5.6 cm。记录并观察手术时间、热缺血时间、出血量及术后住院天数。结果 29例患者手术均顺利完成,无中转开放手术。手术时间75~130 min,缺血时间11~28 min,出血量30~150 ml,术后住院5~8 d,随访3~15个月,无复发和转移。结论利用末端可弯3D腹腔镜成像系统行肾部分切除术安全有效。 Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with fle-xible three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy. Methods Twenty-nine patients with renal neoplasm were treated by flexible 3D laparoscopic partial nephrectomy from December 2014 to December 2015 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, including 18 males are 11 females, who were 37 -65 years old. Tumor diameter was 2. 2 - 5. 6 cm. We observed and recorded parameters including operative time, warm ischemic time, blood loss and length of post-operative hospital stay. Results Operations in all the 29 patients were completed successfully without conversion to open surgery. The operative time was 75 -130 minutes, the warm ischemic time was 11 - 28 minutes and the estimated blood loss was 30 -150 ml. The post-operative hospital stay was 5 - 8 days. There was no recurrence within 3- 1 5 months of follow- up. Conclusions Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with flexi-ble 3D laparoscopic surgery is safe and effective.
出处 《协和医学杂志》 2017年第1期43-45,共3页 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
关键词 肾切除术 可弯3D腹腔镜 治疗结果 nephrectomy flexible 3D laparoscopy effectiveness of treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Nam KW, Park J, Kim IY, et al. Application of stereo-imaging technology to medical field. Healthc Inform Res, 2012, 18 : 158- 163.
  • 2Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, et al. 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the funda- mentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2012, 22: 865-870.
  • 3Sohn W, Lee HJ, Ahlering TE. Robotic surgery: review of pros- tate and bladder cancer. Cancer J, 2013, 19: 133-139.
  • 4von Pichler C, Radermacher K, Boeckmann W, et al. Three- dimensional versus two-dimensional video endoscopy: a clinical field study in laparoscopic application. Stud Health Technol Inform, 1996, 29: 667-674.
  • 5Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, et al. 5-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol, 1993, 1 : 40- 46.
  • 6Calvano CJ, Moran ME, Tackett LD, et al. New visualization techniques for in utero surgery: amnioscopy with a three-dimen- sional head-mounted display and a computer-controlled endo- scope. J Endourol, 1998, 12: 407-410.
  • 7Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Rassweiler J, et al. Three-dimen- sional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks. J Endourol, 2012, 26: 1085-1088.
  • 8Chan AC, Chang SC, Yim AP, et al. Comparison of two-dimen- sional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic sur- gery. Surg Endosc, 1997, 11 : 438-440.
  • 9Yoshida T, Inoue H, Hara E, et al. Newly developed 3D endo- scopic system: preliminary experience. Endoscopy, 2003, 35 : 181-184.
  • 10Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, et al. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26: 1454-1460.

共引文献103

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部