期刊文献+

164例骶骨原发肿瘤患者术后骶神经功能评价 被引量:8

Functional outcomes after sacral resection: a case series study of 164 cases with primary sacral tumor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨骶骨原发肿瘤患者接受手术治疗后的骶神经功能情况。方法骶骨原发肿瘤患者164例,术后通过电话随访患者皮肤感觉、行走功能、排尿费力、尿失禁、排尿感觉、排便费力、便失禁、排便感觉等情况,比较接受不同节段骶骨手术患者术后的骶神经功能,总结保留不同层面骶神经根对患者生活质量的影响。结果骶神经根离断水平越高对术后功能影响越明显,但不同层面骶神经对各方面功能的影响不尽相同。至少保留双侧S1神经根的患者术后出现严重皮肤感觉障碍、行走费力、步态异常以及需借助辅助装置转移等情况的概率明显低于仅保留双侧L5神经根的患者;至少保留单侧S3神经根患者术后出现排尿排便费力、尿和便失禁及排尿和排便感觉减退的概率及严重程度明显低于双侧S3神经根均被切除患者。而保留双侧S3神经根的患者发生尿失禁及漏尿的概率又明显低于仅保留一侧S3神经根患者。保留单侧全部骶神经根患者,其二便功能水平大致介于保留单侧S3及保留双侧S2患者之间。结论至少保留单侧S3神经根对保留患者术后的排尿和排便功能有着非常重要的作用。 Objective To investigate the postoperative neurological function of patients with primary sacral tumors. Methods Walking function, sensation, bowel and bladder continence, feeling of micturition and defecation were recorded for 164 consecutive primary sacral tumor patients after sacrectomy. Postoperative func-tional outcomes were compared in groups with different spared nerve levels. Results Patients with higher nerve root level sacrificed had worse function outcomes. Majority of motor and sensory function in lower limbs were preserved in patients with bilateral SI nerve roots spared. Compared with bilateral S3 nerve sacrificed, patients with unilateral S3 preserved had a lower incidence and degree of dysuria, bladder incontinence, abnormal blad-der sensation, constipation, fecal incontinence and abnormal rectal sensation. And the patients with bilateral S3 nerve preserved had a better outcome than those with unilateral S3 nerve preserved in the probability and degree of urine incontinence. The functional status of patients with unilaterally preserved S1-S4 falls in between the groups with preserved unilateral S3 and bilateral S2. Conclusion Preservation of at least one S3 nerve root in sacral resection saves bowel and bladder function in the majority of patients.
出处 《骨科临床与研究杂志》 2017年第1期42-49,共8页 Journal Of Clinical Orthopedics And Research
关键词 骶骨 骨肿瘤 脊神经根 排尿 排便 Sacrum Bone neoplasms Spinal nerve root Urination Defecation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1徐万鹏,宋献文,乐守玉,蔡 伯,吴捷.骶骨肿瘤及其外科治疗(123例手术分析)[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14(2):67-71. 被引量:74
  • 2Simon MA,Springfield D. Surgery for Bone and soft-tissue tumors. Philadelphia:Lippincott-Raven Publishers,1998.444-450.
  • 3Touraj T, Daneil BF, Theldore XO. Sacral resection operative technique and outcome. Arch Surg,1990,125:911-913.
  • 4Yonemoto T,Tatezaki S, Takenouchi T,et al.The Surgical management of sacrococcygeal chordoma.Cancer,1999,85:878-883.
  • 5York JE, Kaczaraj A, Abi-Said D,et al. Sacral chordoma: 40-Year experience at a major cancer center.Neurosurgery,1999,44:74-79.
  • 6Berven S, Zurakowski D, Mankin HJ,et al.Clincal outcome in chordoma. Spine, 2002, 27:374-379.
  • 7Cheng EY,Ozerdemoglu RA,Transfeldt EE,et al.Lumbosacral chordoma:prognostic factors and treatment.Spine,1999,24:1639-1645.
  • 8Turcotte RT, Sim FH,Unni KK.Giant cell tumor of the sacrum. Clin Orthop,1993,291:215-221.
  • 9Ozdemir MH,Gurkan I,Yildiz Y,et al.Surgical treatment of malignant tumors of the sacrum. Eur Surg Oncol,1999,25:44-49.
  • 10Bergh P,Kindblom LG,Gunterberg B,et al.Prognostic factors in chordoma of the sacrum and mobile spine.Cancer,2000,88:2122-2133.

共引文献109

同被引文献115

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部