摘要
基于对抗性技术效应理论,运用对抗性技术效益公式,分别对2015年羽毛球世锦赛中国羽毛球男单选手谌龙、林丹和王睁茗的防守性技术效益、控制性技术效益和进攻性技术效应进行统计和分析。结果表明:防守性技术的技术效益,谌龙发挥最好,且十分稳定,控制性技术的技术效益谌龙的发挥是三人中最不理想的,林丹和王睁茗二人的使用效果高,发挥效果较好,进攻性技术的技术效益,谌龙效果较好,而林丹与王睁茗的进攻性技术的技术效益相差不明显,使用程度一般。结论:谌龙、林丹和王睁茗三人的整体技术发挥都较为理想,无论是防守性技术、控制性技术或者进攻性技术,三人都表现出了较高的水平,其中谌龙的发挥比林丹和王睁茗更稳定,各项技术的使用较为合理,但在一些细小技术环节三人还需要进一步提高。
In this article, based on the theory of Antago-nistic technology, using the formula of Antagonistic tech-nology, the Chinese men single badminton players Lin Dan,Chen Long and Wang Zhengming in the 2015 Bad-minton World Championships are studied respectively for the data of defense of technical efficiency, control of tech-nical efficiency and Tensive of technology effect. The re-suits show that the technical efficiency of defense technol-ogy, Chen long is the best and the stablest. But for the control technology and technology benefit, Chen long is the worst of these three persons. The using effect is high between Lin Dan and Wang Zhengming, and the technolo-gy is relatively mature. For the technology efficiency of of-fensive technology,Chen long does a good job,and for the technical benefits offensive technology, Lin Dan and Wang Zhengming have no significant difference, but the level of use is general. Conclusion; their competition in the overall play are ideal, all in the defensive technology, control technology and offensive technology, they showed high level and stable play. Especially Chen long are more sta-ble than Lin Dan and Wang Zhengming, and his using of the technology is reasonable. But as the world best athi- letes,they all have oneworst index,for example. So each of them need to improve in small technical aspects.
出处
《南京体育学院学报(自然科学版)》
2016年第6期59-64,共6页
Joournal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education:Natural Science
基金
贵州省科技厅联合基金项目(编号:LH7485)
关键词
羽毛球
对抗性技术效益
制约性技术
防守技术
控制性技术
进攻技术
badminton
theory of antagonistic technology
restrictive technology
defense technique
control techni-cal
fensive technology