期刊文献+

金属蜂窝钎焊结构焊缝质量的超声C扫描定量评价工艺 被引量:3

Ultrasonic C-Scan evaluation on brazed joint of metal honeycomb
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对金属蜂窝钎焊结构超声C扫描检测工艺不规范,难以有效定量评价焊缝质量的问题,开展了超声C扫描定量评价工艺研究.建立了蜂窝钎焊结构表征模型,指出有效声束尺寸是影响检测的主要工艺参数.进行了多组工艺试验.结果表明,声束直径在蜂窝尺寸的0.7倍以下能够获得满足定量评价要求的C扫描图像,频率和扫描间距对图像质量也有一定影响.编制了定量评价软件实现了金属蜂窝钎焊结构焊缝质量的超声C扫描自动定量评价. The brazed joints of metal honeycomb are hard to control due to the difficulties in the inspection and quantitatively evaluation of the joining quality.The nondestructive evaluation on brazed joints of metal honeycombs was studied by means of ultrasonic C scan method.A model was established to describe the structure of the joints,and the effective beam diameter was recognized as the key parameter to the inspection.Experiments were performed and results showed that the beam diameter less than 0.7 honeycomb diameter will lead to C scan image required for quantitatively evaluation of the joining quality,and that the frequency and scanning index can affect the final image to some extent.Software was developed to process the images and evaluate the bonding rate through C scan images of the brazed joints of metal honeycomb.
出处 《焊接学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第12期110-114,共5页 Transactions of The China Welding Institution
关键词 金属蜂窝 钎焊 超声C扫描 无损评价 metal honeycomb brazed joint ultrasonic C scan nondestructive evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1静永娟,李晓红,岳喜山.TC1钛合金蜂窝夹层结构的钎焊工艺研究与分析[J].航空制造技术,2012,55(13):137-139. 被引量:18
  • 2蔡晋辉,张光新,周泽魁.面积重构H顶变换的实现与应用[J].光电工程,2005,32(3):73-77. 被引量:4
  • 3王铮,卢超,邬冠华,吴伟,王伏喜.舰船钛合金超声检测信号模型及模极大值小波去噪算法分析[J].舰船科学技术,2005,27(3):67-71. 被引量:4
  • 4张洪涛,何鹏,孔庆伟,唐旭东,苏琳,杨国峰,孙静波.铝钢异种材料焊接研究现状与发展[J].焊接,2006(12):7-12. 被引量:32
  • 5Clauclio R J. Unsupervised multiscale segmentation of color images [J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2007, 28(4) : 523 -533.
  • 6Mayer F, Beucher S. Morphology segmentation[ J]. Visual Communication and Image Representation, 1990, 1(1) : 21 -46.
  • 7Donald J Spinella, John R Brockenbrough, Joseph M Fridy.Trends in aluminum resistance spot welding for the auto industry[J]. Welding Journal, 2005, 84(1): 34-40.
  • 8Mansour T. Ultrasonic inspection of spot welds in thin-gage steel[J]. Materials Evaluation, 1988, 46(5): 650-658.
  • 9Aytul Ercil, Yagmur Denizhan, Ahmet Okcular, et al. Classification trees prove useful in nondestructive testing of spot weld quality[J]. Welding Journal, 1993, 72(9): 59-67.
  • 10Tusek J, Blatnik T. Ultrasonic detection of lack of fusion in spot welds[J]. Non-destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 2002, 44(11): 684-688.

共引文献25

同被引文献56

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部