期刊文献+

罗尔斯正义论视域下探讨高值药物医保支付机制公平性原则 被引量:2

Discussing the equity principle of medical payment mechanism of high-value drugs in view of Rawls' justice theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高值药物医保支付提升了患者药物可及性的同时也带来了一些涉及医疗资源分配的公平性问题。罗尔斯的正义论作为当代社会公平理论中最具影响力的理论之一,对于高值药物医保支付机制公平性的完善同样具有指导意义。在罗尔斯正义原则视域下,相关部门及利益方须在高值药物医保支付所涉及的药物遴选、谈判定价、使用管理等环节把握公平与效率平衡原则,同时多方联动保障"最少受惠者"切实享有相关的"政策福利"。 Medical payment mechanism of high-value drugs can improve the accessibility for many patients, while it has brought about the issue of equity of medical resource allocation. As the most influential equity theory, John Rawls justice theory can be used to improve the equity of medical payment mechanism of high-value drugs. It is suggested for the government and rele- vant stakeholders to assure the fairness and efficiency in drugs selection, pricing negotiation, using management and other impor- tant stages.
出处 《中国卫生事业管理》 北大核心 2017年第1期33-35,67,共4页 Chinese Health Service Management
基金 湖北省医保协会资助项目"湖北省创新药物医保准入机制研究"(编号:HR2015001)
关键词 高值药物 医保支付 罗尔斯正义论 最少受惠者 high-value drugs medical insurance payment mechanism Rawls justice theory the least advantaged group.
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献52

  • 1龚幼龙,陈家应,Henry Lucas,黄德明,翁仲华.企、事业职工家庭卫生服务公平性研究[J].中国卫生资源,2001,4(4):163-165. 被引量:11
  • 2小林安木他,夏宗明.日本医师的地理分布[J].国外医学(卫生经济分册),1993,10(2):71-74. 被引量:17
  • 3[英]约翰·密尔.《论自由》.第13、1页,程崇华译,北京,商务印书馆,1982.
  • 4[英]约翰·穆勒(密尔).《功利主义》,第12页,徐大建译,上海,世纪出版集团,2008.
  • 5Philip Pettit, Judging Justice .. An Introduction to 03ntemporary Political Philosophy, Rougledge,1980,p. 108,p. 109.
  • 6Jeremy Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Methuen & Co. Ltd, 1982,pp. 39--40.
  • 7A. K. Sen, "Rawls versus Bentham.. An Axionatic Examination of the Pure Distribution Problem", in Norman Daniels ed. Reading Rawls , Critical Studies on Rawls ' A Theory of Justice, Stanford University Press, 1975, p284.
  • 8Plamenatz ed. , Mill's Utilitarianism, Backwell, 1949, p. 198.
  • 9Hugh S. R. Elliot ed. , The Letters of John Stuart Mill, London : Longmans, Green and Co. ,1910,Vol. Ⅱ,p. 116.
  • 10David D. Raphael, "Fallacies in and about Mill's Utilitarianism", in G. W. Smith ed. , John Stuart Mill's Social and Political Thought(Vol. 1), Routledge, 1998,p. 53.

共引文献77

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部