期刊文献+

物源分析的一个误区:砂粒在河流搬运过程中的变化 被引量:12

A misunderstanding in provenance analysis:Sand changes of mineral,roundness,and size in flowing-water transportation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 长期以来,中国沉积学界存在一个认识误区,认为"碎屑物质在流水搬运过程中,其不稳定成分逐渐变少,粒度逐渐变小,圆度逐渐变好",并把这一认识错误地运用到对砂岩的物源分析中。作者基于文献调研和现代河流砂研究成果,评述了关于砂粒的不稳定矿物含量、磨圆度、粒度这3个重要参数的研究进展,认为河流搬运过程中砂粒并没有向下游出现明显的不稳定矿物丢失,粒度和磨圆度也没有明显变化,这3个参数与搬运距离并无必然关系。因此,根据长石、岩屑、不稳定重矿物的多寡以及粒度大小、磨圆度好坏来推测砂岩物源区的距离远近是缺乏科学依据的。 There is a big misunderstanding in the community of Chinese sedimentologists and was written into the textbooks since 1970s,that is,"during sediment transport in flowing water,unstable minerals will be eliminated,while the surviving minerals become rounded progressively,and minerals sizes get smaller". This idea was wrongly applied in sandstone provenance analysis. This paper overviewed the literatures over one century on this topic,and introduced the research advances of modern river sand studies,especially on the physic controls of sand mineral,roundness,size during transportation. Numerous studies in big rivers sands in the world indicated that the unstable minerals such as olivine,pyroxene,amphibole,feldspars and lithic grains survive in thousands of kilometers transportation,while the sand size do not get smaller and sand roundness do not increase with distance downstream. Therefore,the idea to infer distance of provenance based on the amount of unstable minerals,size,and roundness of sandstones is not based on scientific investigation,and should be corrected in the textbooks.
作者 胡修棉
出处 《古地理学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期175-184,共10页 Journal of Palaeogeography:Chinese Edition
基金 国家杰出青年基金项目(编号:41525007) 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:41472081)共同资助~~
关键词 河流砂 搬运 物源分析 沉积学 磨圆度 碎屑矿物 river sand transportation provenance analysis sedimentology roundness detrital mineral
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献148

  • 1吴元保,郑永飞.锆石成因矿物学研究及其对U-Pb年龄解释的制约[J].科学通报,2004,49(16):1589-1604. 被引量:2112
  • 2隋延辉,梁一鸿,戚长谋.根据矿物薄片颜色判估铬尖晶石类型的方法[J].世界地质,2006,25(2):212-212. 被引量:1
  • 3Arai S. 1987. An estimation of the least depleted spinel peridotite on the basis of olivine-spinel mantle array. Neues Jahrbueh Mineralogie, Monatsh, 347-354.
  • 4Arai S. 1992. Chemistry of chromian spinel in volcanic rocks as a potential guide to magma chemistry. Mineralogical Magazine, 56: 173-184.
  • 5Arai S. 1994. Characterization of spinel peridotites by olivine- spinel compositional relationships., review and interpretation. Chemical Geology, 113: 191-204.
  • 6Barnes S J, Roeder P J. 2001. The range of spinel compositions in terrestrial mafic and ultramafic rocks. Journal of Petrology, 42 (12) : 2279-3202.
  • 7Basu A. 2003. A perspective on quantitative provenance analysis. In: Valloni R, Basu A. (Eds.), Quantitative Provenance Studies in Italy, Mcmorie Descrittive della Carta Geologica dell Italia, 61: 11-22.
  • 8Bruguier O, Lancelot J R, Malavieille J. 1997. U-Pb dating on single detrital zircon grains from the Triassic Songpan--Ganze flysch (Central China): provenance and tectonic correlations. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 152(1-4): 217-231.
  • 9Bullen M E, Burbank D W, Garver J I, Ahdrakhmatov KY. 2001. Late Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the northwestern Tien Shah: New age estimates for the initiation of mountain building. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 113: 1544-1559.
  • 10Clift P D, Shimizu N, Layne S, Gaedieke C, Sehluter H U, Clark M, Amjad S. 2000. Fifty-five million years of Tibetan evolution recorded in the Indus Fan. Eos 81: 277-281.

共引文献56

同被引文献253

引证文献12

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部