司法改革背景下合议庭投票模式的选择

The Voting Mode of Collegiate Panel in the Background of Judicial Reform

合议庭处理涉及两个或两个以上争点的复杂案件时,依少数服从多数原则,集结每位法官关于案件结论形成的合议庭意见与集结每位法官关于争点的判断并适用相关法律推断出的合议庭意见可能截然相反,形成判断集结的困境。合议庭投票模式困境的存在需要在推进新一轮司法体制改革的背景下予以从工作机制上加以细化和制度完善,在争点投票法、结论投票法和情境投票法中,确立争点投票法的工作机制作为我国审判实践合议庭投票模式的最优选择。

When the collegiate panel deals with complex cases involving two or more disputes,the compiled judgments on the conclusion may be completely opposite according to the principle of the minority,obeying the majority and forming a predicament of judgment assembly. The existence of the plight of the collegiate panel voting mode needs to be refined and improved from the working mechanism under the background of the new judicial system reform. Among the contention voting method,the conclusion voting method and the situation voting method,confirming the working mechanism of contention voting method as the best in our country.