摘要
《文选》与《文心雕龙》因性质不同,故难以比较两者工作量之大小如何。然《文选》与《文心雕龙》"论文叙笔"部分却有着切实的可比性。编纂《文选》的工作量要远小于撰写《文心雕龙》"论文叙笔"部分的。完成同一工作量虽会"因人而异",然在两者有可比性的部分,不管从哪一角度看,其均无太多之"异"。即昭明太子编纂《文选》所花时间仍相应地要比彦和撰写《文心雕龙》的少。撰写《文心雕龙》要比人们想象的费时,而完成《文选》的工作量与难度则被某种程度地放大了。
Because of their different nature,it is difficult to compare the workload of Wen Xuan with that of Wen Xin Diao Long.However,when it comes to and the part of"narration and argumentation"in Wen Xuan and Wen Xin Diao Long,they are comparable as a matter of fact.In this respect,the workload of compiling the book Wen Xuan is much less than that of Wen Xin Diao Long.Even though each person may spend different amount of time to complete the same workload,in this comparable part,it is so much the same in different way.Namely,the time spent by Xiao Tong to compiling Wen Xuan is less than that of Wen Xin Diao Long by Liu Xie,which is more time-consuming than expected.While the workload and difficulty in completing Wen Xuan are exagerated to a certain extent.
出处
《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
北大核心
2016年第6期67-73,共7页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金西部项目"<文选>成书考说"(10XZW010)
关键词
《文选》
《文心雕龙》
昭明太子
刘勰
工作量
Wen Xuan
Wen Xin Diao Long
crown prince Zhao Ming
workload
comparability
the whole is greater that the sum of the parts