期刊文献+

光接触性变态反应试验2种诱导方式的实验研究 被引量:1

Comparison of two induction methods of photo-contact allergy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较光接触性变态反应试验2种诱导方式的敏感性。方法采用完全弗氏佐剂法和完全弗氏佐剂+20%十二烷基硫酸钠(SLS)联合诱导法对强致敏剂四氯水杨基苯胺(TCSA)和弱致敏剂香豆素、硫氯酚的光敏性进行了研究。结果 2种诱导方式均能检出3种受试物的光敏性,但完全弗氏佐剂法诱导3种受试物的红斑水肿分值及阳性致敏率均高于联合诱导法;联合诱导法因诱导阶段连续涂抹SLS,动物染毒部位易出现溃烂,且易使动物对受试物原发性刺激的耐受性降低,激发浓度不易确定。结论完全弗氏佐剂法敏感性和可操作性优于完全弗氏佐剂+20%SLS联合诱导法。 Objective To compare the sensitivity of two induction methods of photocontact allergy. Methods The photo sensitivities of strong sensitizer( tetrachlorodibemzo salicylic anilineltcsa) and the weak sensitizer( coumarin and sulfar chlorophenol)were studied by complete Freund's adjuvant( CFA) and CFA + 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate( SDS) combined-induction methods. Results The two induction methods can both induce the photo sensitivity of three substances,but the erythema and edema scores and positive rate induced by complete Freund's adjuvant method were higher than combined-induction methods; because of continuously applying SLS during induction phase in combined-induction methods,animals' infected areas were prone to fester and reduce the tolerance of primary irritation of the subjects,so the elicitation concentration was not easy to determine. Conclusion The sensitivity and operability of complete Freund's adjuwant is superior to CFA + 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate( SDS) combined-induction.
作者 宋瑞霞 石莹 阮鸿洁 张丽霞 张宏伟 SONG Rui-xia SHIYing RUAN Hong-jie ZHANG Li-xia ZHANG Hong- wei(Institute of Environmental Health and Related Product Safety, China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100021, China)
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 CAS 2017年第1期27-29,33,共4页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
基金 基金项目 国家食品药品监督管理局保健食品化妆品监管司(spypjd003)
关键词 敏感性 光变态反应 完全弗氏佐剂法 联合诱导法 Sensitivity Photo-contact allergy Complete Freund's adjuvant Combined-induction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1霍艳,李波.ICH免疫毒性评价指导原则介绍[J].中国药事,2006,20(10):634-636. 被引量:1
  • 2霍艳,李波.药物免疫毒性评价技术要求的国内外进展[J].中国药学杂志,2006,41(20):1525-1529. 被引量:10
  • 3[1]Gerberick GF, Ryan CA. Investigating contact photoallergy in the mouse. Photobiology. The science and its applications[M]. Edited by Riklis E. New York:Plenum Press, 1991. 671.
  • 4[2]Ichikawa H, Armstrong RB,Harber LC. Photoallergic contact dermatitis in guinea pigs: Improved induction technique using freunds complete adjuvant[J] .J Invest Dermatol, 1981,76:498.
  • 5[3]Maguire HC,Kaidbey K. Experimental photoallergic contact dermatitis:A mouse model[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 1982,79:147.
  • 6[4]Kaidbey KH, Kligman AM. Photosensitization by coumarin derivatives[M]. Arch Dermatol, 1981,117. 258.
  • 7[5]Jackson RT, Nesbitt LT, Deleo VA. 6-Methylcourmarin photocontact dermatitis[J ]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1980,2:124.
  • 8[6]Kochever IE,Zalar GL,Einbinder J ,et al. Assay of contact photosensitivity to musk ambratte in guinea pigs[J ]. J Invest Dermatol, 1979,73:144.
  • 9[7]Wilkinson DS. Photodermatitis due to tetrachlorosalicylanilide[J]. Br J Derrmatol, 1961,73:123.
  • 10Harber LC, Targovnik SE, Baer RL. Contact photosensitivity patterns to halogenated salicylanilides in man and guinea pigs[ J]. Arch Dermatol, 1967, 96(6): 646-656.

共引文献10

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部