期刊文献+

The Role of Nonlinear Forcing Singular Vector Tendency Error in Causing the"Spring Predictability Barrier"for ENSO 被引量:7

The Role of Nonlinear Forcing Singular Vector Tendency Error in Causing the “Spring Predictability Barrier” for ENSO
原文传递
导出
摘要 With the Zebiak-Cane model, the present study investigates the role of model errors represented by the nonlinear forcing singular vector (NFSV) in the "spring predictability barrier" (SPB) phenomenon in ENSO prediction. The NFSV-related model errors are found to have the largest negative effect on the uncertainties of El Nino prediction and they can be classified into two types: the first is featured with a zonal dipolar pattern of SST anomalies (SSTA), with the western poles centered in the equatorial central western Pacific exhibiting positive anomalies and the eastern poles in the equatorial eastern Pacific exhibiting negative anomalies; and the second is characterized by a pattern almost opposite to the first type. The first type of error tends to have the worst effects on El Nifio growth-phase predictions, whereas the latter often yields the largest negative effects on decaying-phase predictions. The evolution of prediction errors caused by NFSV- related errors exhibits prominent seasonality, with the fastest error growth in spring and/or summer; hence, these errors result in a significant SPB related to El Nifio events. The linear counterpart of NFSVs, the (linear) forcing singular vector (FSV), induces a less significant SPB because it contains smaller prediction errors. Random errors cannot generate an SPB for El Nifio events. These results show that the occurrence of an SPB is related to the spatial patterns of tendency errors. The NFSV tendency errors cause the most significant SPB for El Nifio events. In addition, NFSVs often concentrate these large value errors in a few areas within the equatorial eastern and central-western Pacific, which likely represent those areas sensitive to El Nifio predictions associated with model errors. Meanwhile, these areas are also exactly consistent with the sensitive areas related to initial errors determined by previous studies. This implies that additional observations in the sensitive areas would not only improve the accuracy of the initial field but also promote the reduction of model errors to greatly improve ENSO forecasts. With the Zebiak-Cane model, the present study investigates the role of model errors represented by the nonlinear forcing singular vector (NFSV) in the "spring predictability barrier" (SPB) phenomenon in ENSO prediction. The NFSV-related model errors are found to have the largest negative effect on the uncertainties of El Nino prediction and they can be classified into two types: the first is featured with a zonal dipolar pattern of SST anomalies (SSTA), with the western poles centered in the equatorial central western Pacific exhibiting positive anomalies and the eastern poles in the equatorial eastern Pacific exhibiting negative anomalies; and the second is characterized by a pattern almost opposite to the first type. The first type of error tends to have the worst effects on El Nifio growth-phase predictions, whereas the latter often yields the largest negative effects on decaying-phase predictions. The evolution of prediction errors caused by NFSV- related errors exhibits prominent seasonality, with the fastest error growth in spring and/or summer; hence, these errors result in a significant SPB related to El Nifio events. The linear counterpart of NFSVs, the (linear) forcing singular vector (FSV), induces a less significant SPB because it contains smaller prediction errors. Random errors cannot generate an SPB for El Nifio events. These results show that the occurrence of an SPB is related to the spatial patterns of tendency errors. The NFSV tendency errors cause the most significant SPB for El Nifio events. In addition, NFSVs often concentrate these large value errors in a few areas within the equatorial eastern and central-western Pacific, which likely represent those areas sensitive to El Nifio predictions associated with model errors. Meanwhile, these areas are also exactly consistent with the sensitive areas related to initial errors determined by previous studies. This implies that additional observations in the sensitive areas would not only improve the accuracy of the initial field but also promote the reduction of model errors to greatly improve ENSO forecasts.
作者 段晚锁 赵鹏 胡均亚 徐辉 DUAN Wansuo1 ZHAO Peng2 HU Junya1 3 XU Hui1
出处 《Journal of Meteorological Research》 SCIE CSCD 2016年第6期853-866,共14页 气象学报(英文版)
基金 Supported by the China Meteorological Administration Special Public Welfare Research Fund(GYHY201306018) National Natural Science Foundation of China(41230420 and 41525017) National Program on Global Change and Air–Sea Interactions(GASI-IPOVAI-06)
关键词 spring predictability barrier model error optimal perturbation El Nifio event spring predictability barrier, model error, optimal perturbation, El Nifio event
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献26

  • 1Chen, D., M. A. Cane, A. Kaplan, S. E. Zebiak, and D. J. Huang, 2004: Predictability of El Nino over the past 148 years. Nature, 428, 733-736.
  • 2Duan, W. S., 2003: Applications of nonlinear optimization method to the studies of ENSO predictability. Ph. D. dissertation, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 111pp. (in Chinese).
  • 3Duan, W. S., M. Mu, and B. Wang, 2004: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation as the optimal precursors for ENSO events. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23105.
  • 4Duan, W. S., X. Liu, K. Y. Zhu, and M. Mu, 2009: Exploring initial errors that cause a significant spring predictability barrier for El Nino events. J. Geophys. Res., 114, C04022, doi: 10.1029/2008JC004925.
  • 5Flugel, M., and P. Chang, 1998: Does the predictability of ENSO depend on the seasonal cycle? J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 3230-3243.
  • 6Garay, J. Z., 2004: Influence of stochastic forcing on ENSO prediction. J. Geophys. Res., 109, C1107.
  • 7Jin, E. K., and Coauthors, 2008: Current status of ENSO prediction skill in coupled ocean-atmosphere models. Climate Dyn., 31,647-664.
  • 8Latif, M., and Coauthors, 1998: A review of the predictability and prediction of ENSO. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14357-14393.
  • 9Liu, Z. Y., 2002: A simple model study of ENSO suppression by external periodic forcing. J. Atmos. Sci., 15, 1088-1098.
  • 10Moore, A. M., and R. Kleeman, 1996: The dynamics of error growth and predictability in a coupled model of ENSO. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 1405 -1446.

共引文献24

同被引文献54

引证文献7

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部