期刊文献+

浸润性导管乳腺癌与浸润性小叶乳腺癌的鉴别诊断与预后评估 被引量:6

Differential Diagnosis and Prognosis of Infiltrating Ductal Breast Cancer and Invasive Lobular Breast
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了浸润性导管乳腺癌(IDC)与浸润性小叶乳腺癌(ILC)的鉴别诊断与预后评估,选取笔者所在医院2010年1月至2014年10月的350例IDC患者和40例ILC患者,分为两组,均进行了钼靶X线和超声检查,并进行24个月的随访。结果IDC组的钼靶X线和超声检出率均高于ILC组(P<0.05);两组肿瘤位置、多中心多灶性、同时性双乳癌发生率和雌激素受体(ER)阳性表达率都具有差异,IDC的两年内存活率明显高于ILC(P<0.05)。ILC的预后更差,病理学检查对乳腺癌分型可以使组织分型更准确,提高治疗效果,同时要注意ILC患者的保乳手术后的复发风险。 To evaluate the differential diagnosis and prognosis of infiltrating ductal breast cancer and invasive lobular breast cancer.350 patients with invasive ductal breast cancer and 40 patients with invasive lobular breast cancer were divided into two groups.The patients were divided into two groups:molybdenum target X-ray and ultrasonography.The detection rate of the IDC group of mammography and ultrasonography were higher than ILC group(P0.05);two groups of tumor location,multicenter,multifocal,double breast cancer and the positive rate of ER has the difference rate,IDC two years survival rate was significantly higher than that of ILC(P0.05).The prognosis of ILC is worse.The use of pathological examination of breast cancer classification can make the organization more accurate,improve the treatment effect,and should pay attention to the recurrence risk of ILC patients after breast conserving surgery.
作者 邹佳黎 吴培新 唐雪杰 刘蜀 ZOU Jia-li WU Pei- xin TANG Xue-jie et al.(Department of Breast Oncology , Guiyang Maternal and Child Health-care Hospital, Guiyang 550001, China)
出处 《医学与哲学(B)》 2016年第12期47-49,共3页 Medicine & Philosophy(B)
关键词 浸润性导管乳腺癌 浸润性小叶乳腺癌 鉴别诊断 预后评估 invasive ductal breast cancer(IDC) invasive lobular breast cancer(ILC) differential diagnosis prognostic evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献184

  • 1范林军,姜军,杨新华,张毅,陈显春.全腔镜乳腺癌皮下腺体切除一期假体植入乳房重建[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(6):484-487. 被引量:17
  • 2杨洁,韩为东,赵亚力.雌激素与乳腺癌[J].现代肿瘤医学,2007,15(3):431-433. 被引量:22
  • 3Esposito N N,Chivukula M,Dabbs D J,魏兵(摘译),步宏(审校).乳腺管状小叶癌E-cadherin/cate-nin的表达[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2007,23(3):274-274. 被引量:8
  • 4徐江锋,罗庚求.上皮细胞间质转型与肿瘤转移[J].国际病理科学与临床杂志,2007,27(5):393-396. 被引量:17
  • 5Bardia A,Baselga J.Neoadjuvant therapy as a platform for drug development and approval in breast cancer[J].Clin Cancer Res,2013,19(23):6360-6370.
  • 6Chen Y J,Yeh M H,Yu M C,et al.Lapatinib induced NFkappa B activation sensitizes triple-negative breast cancer cells to proteasome inhibitors[J].Breast Cancer Res,2013,15 (6):R108.
  • 7Rakha E A,El Sayed M E,Green A R,et al.Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer[J].Cancer,2007,109(1):25-32.
  • 8Wang L,Zhang Q,Zhang J,et al.PI3K pathway activation results in low efficacy of both trastuzumab and lapatinib[J].BMC Cancer,2011,15(11):248-257.
  • 9Jones N,Bonnet F,Sfar S,et al.Comprehensive analysis of PTEN status in breast cardnomas[J].Int J Cancer,2013,133(2):323-334.
  • 10Inanc M,Ozkan M,Karaca H,et al.Cytokeratin 5/6,oMet expressions,and PTEN loss prognostic indicators in triple negative breast cancer[J].Med Oncol,2014,31 (1):801.

共引文献49

同被引文献63

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部