摘要
基于将"抵抗资本逻辑"细化为"行为抵抗抽象劳动"与"抽象劳动抵抗资本"两个层面,霍洛威批判了传统马克思主义过于重视后一种路径及其所倡导的劳工运动,但这一方向的实践导致了诸多的现实困境。在他看来,应该从"抽象劳动抵抗资本"转向围绕"行为"本身去寻求一种有尊严的裂缝式革命。但实质上,霍洛威所构想的革命理念要求废除资本的支配地位却又不触及对国家权力的反抗,本身是一个悖论,这不可能迎来自我确定(自决)的社会或共产主义社会。它表面上的激进,实质上遣散了左派的力量,走向一种新无政府主义。
Based on the division of"resistance against the capital logics"into two forms:doing against abstract labor and abstract labor against capital,Holloway criticizes the latter approach that overestimated by traditional Marxism which has led to so many difficulties of reality.From the perspectives of Holloway,it is needed to search for a dignified Interstitial Revolution in the form of doing itself coming from the abstract labor against capital.Essentially,what Holloway's theory of revolution requires is to abandon the domination of capital,but it finally does not touch on the rebellion against the state power,which seems to be a dilemma and it is difficult to bring a self-determined or communist society.Itappears to be radical and demobilizes the power of the Left in fact.This leads to be a neo-anarchism.
作者
孙亮
SUN Liang(East China Normal Universit)
出处
《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期45-53,共9页
Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences)
基金
上海市哲学社会科学基金一般项目(2016BZX005)