运动式治理的历史、现状与转型:一个研究综述

Research review on the history,status quo and future of campaign-style governance

运动式治理受到学界越来越广泛的关注。作为国家治理实践中屡试不爽的治理工具,运动式治理已经成为理性化、制度化、专业化的常规治理机制在科层组织治理失效后的有效补充工具和纠偏机制。路径依赖、重塑合法性、管理资源与政策工具有限性以及组织失败与制度矫正逻辑,是运动式治理在治理实践中被大规模使用的重要原因。伴随着对运动式治理类型学研究的逐渐精细化,学界对运动式治理的态度经历了从完全否定到有限承认再到理性认知的转变,表现出日渐理性化的趋势。走向法治化、制度化、协作治理与合作治理是众多学者推崇的运动式治理转型方向。因此,应该从更一般的组织学意义上深化对运动式治理的认知与学术研究,探讨运动式治理的转型问题。

Campaign-style governance has been attracting increasing academic attention. As the governance tool in national practice, campaign-style governance has become an effective eomplement and corrective mechanism after the failure of ra- tional, institutionalized and professional mechanism in bureaucracy governance. The important reasons why campaign- style governance is widely used in governance practice involves the path dependence, legitimacy rebuilding, the limitation of governance resources, organizations failure and institutional corrections logic and so on. With the gradually refined re- search on campaign-style governance typology, the aeademic circle＇s attitude transforms from total denial to limited recog- nition and finally to rational cognition, showing the rational tendency. Legalization, institutionalization, collaborative and cooperative governance are the main transition direction that most seholars praise highly. Therefore, It is necessary to deepen the cognition and academic research on campaign-style governance from more general histological sense.