宫颈癌筛查中2种检查方法效果比较

Application effect comparison of two kinds of inspection methods in cervical cancer screening

目的比较传统巴氏涂片和液基薄层细胞学检测法在宫颈癌筛查中的应用效果。方法选取2014年1月-2016年6月在医院进行健康体检的女性800例,依次采用传统巴氏涂片检查法及液基薄层细胞学检测法进行检测。对比2组宫颈癌检出结果及制片质量和检验成本。结果液基薄层细胞学检测法检出宫颈癌阳性114例(14.25%)高于传统巴氏涂片检查法的75例(9.38%)(P<0.05)。液基薄层细胞学检测法制片质量明显优于传统巴氏涂片检查法(P<0.05)。但2种检查方法的检查成本并无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论在健康体检中采用液基薄层细胞学检测法对受试对象进行宫颈癌的筛查其检测结果更加准确,值得在临床广泛推广应用。

Objective To compared the applicated effect of conventional pap smear and liquid-based thin-layer cytology test in cervical cancer screening. Methods Selected 800 cases female health examination in hospital from January 2014 to June 2016. 800 cases female health examination adopted conventional pap smear and liquid-based thin-layer cytology test. Compared the screening results,production quality and inspection cost of 2 methods. Results 114 cases（ 14. 25%） of cervical cancer were detected by liquid-based thin-layer cytology test,75 cases（ 9. 38%） of cervical cancer were detected by conventional pap smear,the difference was statistic significantly（ P〈0. 05）. The production quality of liquid-based thin-layer cytology test was better than that of conventional pap smear（ P〈0. 05）. The check costs between liquid-based thin-layer cytology test and conventional pap smear was no statistic significantly（ P〉0. 05）. Conclusion The test results of liquid-based thin-layer cytology test in cervical cancer screening is accurate,worthy of clinical application.