期刊文献+

英语名词可数性转换习得中的抑制因子探究 被引量:5

On the inhibiting factors in the acquisition of English converted count/mass use
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究在基于使用的语言学框架下,探讨了固化、语义占位、名词指称个体化程度等因素对中国学生习得英语名词可数性转换的抑制作用。受试为初三、高一和高三学生,实验要求他们对可数名词及其转换的不可数用法、不可数名词及其转换的可数用法进行可接受性判断。结果显示:可数名词的使用频率显著抑制受试对该名词转换的不可数用法的习得;可数名词与其转换的不可数用法语义相似度随着语言输入量的增加逐渐抑制转换的不可数用法的习得。不可数名词的使用频率和名词所指个体化程度显著抑制受试对该名词的转换可数用法的习得;不可数名词与其转换的可数用法语义相似度随着语言输入量的增加逐渐抑制转换的可数用法的习得。研究结果支持固化、语义占位、个体连续统假设。 This study, in the framework of usage-based linguistics, investigated the effects of entrenchment, preemption and nouns' individuation on L2 acquisition of English converted count/mass use. Participants were Chinese third-year middle school students, first-year high school students and thirdyear high school students, who rated the acceptability of count nouns, mass nouns, converted count use, and converted mass use. Results show that 1) the frequency of count nouns significantly inhibits the participants' acceptability of converted mass use, and the semantic similarity between count nouns and converted mass use gradually inhibits the acceptability of converted mass use as their English proficiency improves; 2) the frequency of mass nouns and the extent of nouns' individuation significantly inhibits the participants' acceptability of converted count use, and the semantic similaritybetween mass nouns and converted count use gradually inhibit the acceptability of converted count use as their English proficiency improves. These results support the entrenchment, preemption and individuation hypotheses, respectively.
机构地区 北方民族大学
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期98-110,共13页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"频率分布和二语构式习得有效路径研究"(15CYY018)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献65

  • 1沈家煊.“有界”与“无界”[J].中国语文,1995(5):367-380. 被引量:973
  • 2温宾利,陈宗利.汉语名词的可数性特征及句法实现[J].现代外语,2002,25(2):195-203. 被引量:19
  • 3赵翠莲.多义词心理表征的发展模式——基于对中国EFL学习者的实验研究[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(4):294-302. 被引量:30
  • 4Apresjan, J. 1974. Regular polysemy [J]. Linguistics 142: 5-32.
  • 5Beauvillain, C. & J. Grainger. 1987. Accessing interlexical homographs: Some limitations of a language-selective access [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 26: 658-672.
  • 6Brisard, F. B., G. V. Rillaer & D. Sandra. 2001. Processing polysemous, homonymous, and vague adjectives [A]. In H. Cyuckens & B. E. Zawada (eds.). Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics; Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference [C]. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
  • 7Croft, W. 1998. Linguistic evidence and mental representations [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 2: 151-173.
  • 8Deignan, A. 2001. Meataphor[M]. Harper Collins Publisher.
  • 9Frisson, S. & M. J. Picketing. 2001. Obtaining a figurative interpretation of a word: Support for underspecification [ J ]. Metaphor and Symbol 16: 3-4, 14,9-171.
  • 10Grainger, J. & T. Dijkstra. 1992. On the representation and use of language information in bilinguals [A]. In R. Harris (ed.). Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals [C]. Amsterdarm: North-Holland.

共引文献23

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部