期刊文献+

三种梁柱单元在结构非线性分析中的精确性比较研究 被引量:2

Accuracy comparison research of three nonlinear elements for structural nonlinear analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 预测结构在罕遇地震作用下的非线性行为是结构基于抗震性能设计和评估中的关键问题,而其首要问题在于解决结构构件的非线性分析模型问题。本文介绍了结构非线性分析中三种常用的宏观单元模型,即基于刚度法的梁柱单元(DB)、基于柔度法的梁柱单元(FB)以及基于柔度法的塑性铰单元(PH)模型。基于PEER柱子试验数据库,将三种单元数值模拟结果与相应的试验结果进行对比,并以峰值强度之比、初始刚度之比和能量耗散能力之比三个指标统计评估了三种单元数值模拟的精确性。研究结果表明,PH单元计算结果的初始刚度之比和能量耗散能力之比均好于DB和FB单元,三种单元计算结果的峰值强度之比较接近,PH单元模拟精度最好。 Predicting structural nonlinear behaviors under rare earthquake is the key issues of performance based on structural design and evaluation,and the most important issue lies in getting resolved of structural nonlinear models. Displacement-Based( DB),Force-Based( FB) and Plastic Hinge( PH) elements which are commonly used in macro-fiber element models of structural analysis are introduced in this paper firstly. Based on PEER column test database,numerical simulation results of the three elements are compared with test results,and the accuracy of elements is evaluated statistically according to the peak strength ratio,initial stiffness ratio and energy dissipation capacity ratio of the global responses. The research demonstrates that initial stiffness ratio and energy dissipation capacityratio of PH element are the best of the three elements,and the peak strength ratios of three elements are about the same values. PH element is the most accurate element.
出处 《建筑科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期1-5,共5页 Building Science
基金 国家科技支撑计划课题项目(2012BAJ07B03)
关键词 非线性梁柱单元 非线性分析 滞回曲线 数值模拟 nonlinear beam-column element nonlinear analysis hysteresis curve numerical simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1韩小雷,陈学伟,吴培烽,郑宜,杨志强.OpenSEES的剪力墙宏观单元的研究[J].世界地震工程,2008,24(4):76-81. 被引量:10
  • 2Fabio F Taucer, Enrico Spacone. A fiber beam-column element for seismic response analysis of reinforced concrete structures [R]. USA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, 1991.
  • 3McKenna F, Fenves G L. The OpenSEES Command Language Primer [R]. USA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, University of California, 2000.
  • 4Graham H Powell. A state of the art educational event performance based design using nonlinear analysis[R]. Computers and Structures Inc., 2007.
  • 5陈学伟 何伟球.基于OpenSEES的预应力混凝土构件弹塑性分析.工业建筑,2007,:67-71.
  • 6Kabeyasawa T. US-Japan cooperative research on R/C full - scale building test, Part 5: Discussion of dynamic response system [C]. Proceeding of 8th WCEE, USA: WCEE, 1984.
  • 7Vulcano A, Bertero V V. Analytical model for predicating the lateral response of RC shear wall: evaluation of their reliability [R]. USA: EERC - 87/19, 1987.
  • 8Fischinger M, Isakovic T. Benchmark analysis of structural wall [C]. Proceeding of 12th WCEE, New Zealand: WCEE, 2000.
  • 9National research institute for earth science and disaster prevention. Blind Analysis Contest 2007 results of the contest [Z]. http://www.blind-anlaysis.jp/index_e.htm, appendix_e.pdf. 2007-12-21.
  • 10韩小雷,季静,何伟球.广州花园酒店西塔“白金五星级酒店”改造结构抗震试验研究报告[R].广州:华南理工大学建筑学院,2006.

共引文献67

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部