期刊文献+

加拿大中小学省级评估与考试研究

原文传递
导出
摘要 加拿大各省和地区均有自行设立的省级评估与考试,在一个多元化的大国中,加拿大一方面有全国性的评价项目,同时在各省具有多种省级考试和评估。省级评估的主要特点是有重考机会,平时成绩计入考试成绩。对加拿大三个典型省份的评估与考试进行剖析,能够全面呈现加拿大教育考试管理制度与考试形式,这对我国不同地区的考试评估提供了很好的借鉴。未来我国中小学阶段的考试与评估应避免单一化。
出处 《课程教学研究》 2017年第1期48-53,共6页 Journal of Curriculum and Instruction
基金 2014年"广东省教育体制综合改革专项资金教育科研重大项目中等教育招生考试制度改革研究"(2014JKZ001) 2015年"广东基础教育课程改革项目"(2015JJKGYJ029)的研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1黄蓉,鲁军.加拿大大学法人治理结构的分析[J].理工高教研究,2009,28(6):97-101. 被引量:8
  • 2Lessinzer,Leon M. Every Kid a Winner: Accountability in Education, 1970,22-26.
  • 3Earl, L. M. Assessment and accountability in education: Improvement or surveillance. Education Canada, 1999, 39(37:4-6,47.
  • 4Heoburn, C. R. The case for school choice: Models from the United States, New Zealand, Denmark, and Sweden,1999.
  • 5Wickstrom,R. A. Accountability: Toward an appropriate aoproach. Education Canada, 1999, 39(3): 16-19.
  • 6Miles, C. A., & Lee, C. In search of soundness in teacher testine: Beyond oolitical validity. Paoer oresented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana., 2002, Aoril.
  • 7Phelps, R. P. Persistently oositive: Forty years of oublic ooinion on standardized testing. In R. P. Phelos (Ed.), Defending standardized testing (pp. 1-22).2005.
  • 8Simner, M. L. A ioint oosition statement by the Canadian Psychological Association and the Canadian Association of School Psvcholo~zists on the Canadian oress coveraze oftheorovince-wide achievement test results, 2000.
  • 9Wolfe, R., Childs, R., & Elsie, S.. Final report of the external evaluation ofEOAO' sassessment processes., 2004.
  • 10Michigan Association of School Psvchologists(MASP). Position statement on the use of the Michigan Educational Assessment Prom'am (MEAP) for hizh stakes decisions for students in Michigan , 2004. Retrieved January 2, 2005 from the MASP Web site:htto://www.masoonline.org/High Stakes Testing in Michigan.htm.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部