理论与体验相结合式健康教育干预对COPD急性加重期患者无创通气治疗临床效果的影响

Effect of Health Education Intervention Based on Theory and Experience on Clinical Efficacy of Non Invasive Ventilation in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD

目的探讨理论与体验相结合式健康教育干预对COPD急性加重期患者无创通气治疗临床效果的影响。方法方便选取2014年2月—2016年6月在该院进行无创通气治疗的COPD急性加重期患者80例,采用数字随机法,将80例COPD急性加重期患者分为对照组、健康教育组。对照组(n=40)患者采用传统护理健康教育,健康教育组(n=40)患者采用理论与体验相结合式健康教育干预(理论教育及体验教育等方式)。记录两组患者进行无创通气治疗时的平均住院天数,观察并比较两组患者无创通气治疗时焦虑状况情况。结果 1健康教育组患者住院天数为(14.46±1.61)d,低于对照组患者(20.01±2.16)d,两组数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);2健康教育组患者焦虑状况低于对照组,两组患者焦虑状况情况比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论理论与体验相结合式健康教育干预临床疗效佳,可有效减轻COPD急性加重期患者的焦虑状况,有利于提高患者生活质量水平。

Objective To investigate the effect of health education intervention based on theory and experience on clinical efficacy of noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Methods Convenient selection 80 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD in our hospital from February 2014 to June 2016 were selected and randomly divided into control group and health education group. Patients in the control group（n=40） were treated with the traditional health education and patients in health education group（n=40） with the combination of theory and experience of health education intervention（theoretical education and experiential education, etc.）. The average hospitalization days were recorded in two groups of patients with noninvasive ventilation and the anxiety status of the two groups were observed and compared. Results 1The time of ICU hospitalization in health education group was lower than that of the control group [（14.46±1.61）d vs（20.01±2.16）d] with statistically significant differences between the two groups of data（P〈0.001）; 2The anxiety of health education group was lower than that of the control group with statistical difference（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The health education intervention of combination of theory and experience can effectively reduce the anxiety of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD and improve the quality of life of patients.The effect ofintervention clinical efficacy is better.