公众参与司法的困境及其对策研究——以S地区人民陪审员制度为例

Research on Dilemmas and Measures of Public Participation in Justice:A Case Study of People's Jury System in the District of S

"司法的公众参与"是近年来理论法学研究的热点课题之一,对S地区"司法公众参与"的实施状况进行了实证分析,发现由于S地区对"司法公众参与"的性质、司法职业化与司法大众化二者的关系认识不清,导致了S地区公民观念以及人民陪审员制度设计陷入失灵的困境;为了解决这一问题,建议重塑以司法职业化为前提的人民司法理念,提高专家陪审员的比例,模仿PPP融资模式以加强公众参与司法的基础设施建设,以期使公民实质性地参与到司法过程中,以服务于S地区乃至全国的司法法治建设。

'Public Participation in Justice'is one of the hot subjects in theoretical study of law.Taking area of S as an example,and does the empirical analysis of the'Public Participation in Justice'in S.The analysis discovers that because of the misunderstanding between the nature of Public Participation in Justice,and judicial professionalism and popularization,both the citizen concept and the design of people's juror system fall into a paralysis dilemma.In order to solve this problem,taking the view that we should remodel the people's judicial philosophy on the premier of judicial professionalism,improve the proportion of expert juror,imitate the financing mode of PPP to enforce the infrastructure construction,hoping to engage the essential participation of the citizen,and to serve for legal construction.