期刊文献+

利益相关者视角下开拓型制度创业机制研究——以阿里巴巴为例 被引量:7

The Mechanism of Pioneering Institutional Entrepreneurship from the Perspective of Stakeholders:Based on the Study Case of Alibaba
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国转型经济背景下,企业家通过开创一种从无到有的制度而形成的制度创业即被认为是开拓型制度创业,以阿里巴巴电商模式为典型代表的开拓型制度创业实践对于开拓型制度创业机制研究具有重要意义。以阿里巴巴为研究对象,从利益相关者视角出发,将阿里巴巴制度创业中利益相关者分为核心利益相关者、蛰伏利益相关者和边缘利益相关者3类。运用扎根理论方法,提炼出阿里巴巴制度创业面临来自利益相关者的制度创业约束、所使用的制度创业策略以及所获取的制度创业合法化,构建出阿里巴巴制度创业机制模型,最终提炼出开拓型制度创业一般机制模型。 Under the China's transition economy background,the pioneering institutional entrepreneurship is defined as an entrepreneur create a new institution that has never existed before,cases such as Alibaba has an important implications on pioneering institutional entrepreneurs.From the perspective of stakeholders,this paper chooses the Alibaba Group as our study case,divide Alibabas stakeholders into three categories:core stakeholders,dormant stakeholders and marginal stakeholders.Continually,we use grounded theory to extract the institutional constrain the entrepreneur has suffered from stakeholders,the institutional strategies the entrepreneur has used and institutional legitimacy that entrepreneur has achieved from stakeholders.Finally,we build the mechanism of pioneering institutional entrepreneurship.
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期9-17,共9页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71372010) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目(15YJA630044) 浙江省软科学研究项目(2015C25038) 浙江工商大学访学项目(FX2014182) 浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地浙商研究中心项目(14JDZS02YB)
关键词 开拓型制度创业 制度创业约束 利益相关者 制度创业策略 扎根理论 Pioneering Institutional Entrepreneurship Institutional Entrepreneurship Constraint Stakeholders Institutional Strategy Grounded Theory
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献181

  • 1彭泗清.信任的建立机制:关系运作与法制手段[J].社会学研究,1999(2):55-68. 被引量:381
  • 2杜卓君.战略型创业:战略管理与创业之交界领域研究评述[J].生产力研究,2006(1):244-246. 被引量:5
  • 3洪大用,肖晨阳.环境关心的性别差异分析[J].社会学研究,2007(2):111-135. 被引量:125
  • 4Aldrich, H. E., Fiol, C. M., 1994, "Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation", Academy of Management Review, 19(4), pp. 545-670.
  • 5Berger, T., Luckmann, P., 1967, The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday Anchor.
  • 6Child, J., Lu, Y., Tsai, T., 2007, "Institutional Entrepreneurship in Building an Environmental Protection System for the People's Republic of China", Organization Studies, 28 (07), pp.1013-1034.
  • 7Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., Scott, W. R., 2002, "Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum", Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1), pp. 45-57.
  • 8DiMaggio, P. J., Powell, W. W., 1983, "The iron cage revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields", Ameri:an Sociological Review, 48, pp. 147-160.
  • 9DiMaggio, P., 1988, "Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory", In Zucker, L. (Eds.), Institutional Patterns and Culture, pp. 3-22, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • 10Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989, "Building Theories from Case Study Research", Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), pp. 532-550.

共引文献606

同被引文献91

引证文献7

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部