期刊文献+

品管圈活动降低出入量统计错误发生率的效果观察 被引量:8

Application effect of QCC on reducing the error rate of intake and output documentation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨品管圈活动降低护士24h出入量统计错误发生率的效果。方法成立院级护理品管圈小组,将“降低护士24h出入量统计错误发生率”设为主题,通过查找问题、制定改进措施、组织实施并标准化等品管方法达到降低错误发生率的目的。调查活动前后的出入量统计错误发生率、护士相关知识的掌握情况和患者满意度。结果实施品管圈活动后,出入量统计错误发生率由32.5%降至9.64%,差异有统计学意义(x2=43.979,P〈0.05);护士相关知识的考核合格率由62.5%提高至93.75%,差异有统计学意义(x2=9.143,P〈0.05);患方对出入量统计的满意度干预后得分(8.80±0.7)分,高于干预前的(6.22±0.815)分,差异有统计学意义(t=16.977,P〈0.05)。结论品管圈活动可以提高护士相关知识的能力水平,降低出入量统计的错误发生率。 Objective To investigate the effect of quality control circle (Qcc) in reducing the error rate of intake and output (I/O) documentation in 24 h.Methods We formed QCC team and set the theme as "Reducing the error rate of intake and output documentation". Qcc principles were used, such as analyzing current situation, setting objectives, making and implementing improvement measures and standardization, to reach the aim of reducing error rate. The error rate and the nurses' capacity of I/O documentation were recorded before and after implementation of QCC. Meanwhile, we surveyed the satisfaction of patients. Results After QCC application, the error rate in I/0 documentation declined from 32.5% to 9.64% ( X2 = 43.979,P〈0.05) ; nurses' scores in knowledge and skill were higher (X2= 9.143,P〈0.05) ; patients were satisfied with the improvements from 62.5% to 93.75% (t= 16.977,P〈0.05).Conclusions The application of QCC can improve the related ability of nurses, and reduce the error rate of I/O documentation.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2016年第32期4711-4714,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 淮安市科技计划专项资金(HAS2015011)
关键词 护士 出入量统计 品管圈 Nurses Intake and output documentation Quality control circle
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献41

  • 1BojarRM.成人心脏外科围术期处理手册.北京:科学出版社,2007:540-544.
  • 2Leon AL, Hoyos NA, Bah'era LI,et al. Clinical course of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock in a cohort of infected patients from ten Colombian hospitals[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2013,13:345.
  • 3Moore LJ, McKinley BA, Turner KL, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in general surgery patients[ J]. J Trauma, 2011,70: 672- 680.
  • 4Moore LJ, Moore FA. Epidemiology of sepsis in surgical patients [J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2012, 92: 1425-1443.
  • 5Park DW, Chun BC, Kim JM,et al. Epidemiologieal and clinical characteristics of eommunity-aequired severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective observational study in 12 university hospitals in Korea[J]. J Korean Med Sei, 2012, 27: 1308-1314.
  • 6Bouchard J, Mehta RL. Fluid balance issues in the critically ill patient[ J]. Contrib Nephrol, 2010,164: 69-78.
  • 7Murphy CV, Schramm GE, Doherty JA,et al. The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock [J]. Chest, 2009, 136: 102-109.
  • 8Alsous F, Khamiees M, DeGirolamo A, et al. Negative fluid balance predicts survival in patients with septic shock: a retrospective pilot study[J]. Chest, 2000, 117: 1749-1754.
  • 9Sadaka F, Juarez M, Naydenov S, et al. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: the effect of increasing fluid balance on mortality [ J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2013.
  • 10Sakr Y, Vincent JL, Reinhart K, et al. High tidal volume and positive fluid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injury[J]. Chest, 2005, 128: 3098-3108. B.

共引文献79

同被引文献62

引证文献8

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部