同步录音录像制度运行中的若干问题探析——以福建省职务犯罪案件为观察对象

Problems in operating synchronous audio and video recordings: an empirical study based on occupational crimes in Fujian province

我国法律没有规定刑事案件侦查讯问时同步录音录像的性质,所以对于同步录音的认识不一。这种情况已经对同步录音录像的规范运用产生重要的影响。基于实证调研的数据,可以对同步录音录像制度在实务中的运行状况、程序规范、存在的问题、同步录音录像的实务运用与效用进行全面的梳理。在此基础上,对同步录音录像性质与定位的争议等问题进行了回应。同步录音录像可作为侦查讯问行为合法性证据和口供补强证据,但一般情况下不能作为案件实体事实的证据。

As lacking legislation, there is great divergence about the recognition of the nature of synchronous audio and video recordings taken in the course of criminal investigation and detection. The divergence has negatively affected the enforcement of regulations on synchronous audio and video recordings. Based on empirical research, we can describe how the system is operated, what is the problem with procedural regulations, and how is the efficacy of this system. This article concludes with response to the debate about the nature and orientation of the synchronous audio and video recordings. Synchronous audio and video recordings can be used to prove the legality of interrogation and corroborate the confession, but they cannot be used to prove material facts of the case.