关于历史人物评价问题的再思考——以中共领袖人物为例

Reconsideration on the Evaluation of Historical Figures:Take Leaders of the Chinese Communist Party as an Example

历史人物评价是一个老问题,无数哲人与史家都在此问题上奉献了自己的才华,但各种因素的影响使得历史人物评价又是一个常说常新的问题。当前,由于各种社会思潮的蔓延与侵袭,对党史领袖人物评价的纷争与分歧也此起彼伏,甚至对同一领袖人物的评价出现了天壤之别,有犹如《圣经》中"使徒行传"式的歌颂,也有"恨不能打入十八层地狱"式的诅咒。所以,有必要从方法论的角度在讨论历史人物过错评析的基础上,厘析中共领袖人物评价的标准,以此来探寻中共领袖人物评价的乱象之源、厘清中共领袖人物评价的真象之本。

How to evaluate historical figures is an old problem,and many philosophers and historians have dedicated their talents to this issue. But the influence of various factors makes the evaluation of historical figures a new problem. At present,due to the spread and invasion of various social trends,there are continual controversy and disagreement of evaluating leaders in the Party history,and even great differences Meyers occur in evaluation about the same leader,either praise in the ＂Acts＂ of the Bible or curse out of great hatred. Therefore,it is necessary to analyze the standard of evaluation of CCP leaders from the perspective of methodology and based on discussion of their mistakes so that we can discover disorders of the evaluation of CCP leaders and clarify the truth of CCP leaders＇ evaluation.