期刊文献+

182例低危初产妇行无保护会阴接生技术的临床效果 被引量:4

Effect of unprotected perineum delivery technique in low risk primipara
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨无保护会阴接生技术对低危阴道分娩初产妇会阴裂伤程度及分娩期并发症的影响。方法选择2015年1~3月,阴道分娩且无会阴侧切指征的初产妇182例,随机分为2组,观察组86例,对照组96例,观察组在胎头着冠后实行无保护会阴接生技术;对照组则按照传统会阴保护接生技术,比较两组产妇的会阴完整率及裂伤程度、会阴水肿情况、产后2 h出血量及新生儿窒息情况。结果观察组的会阴完整率高于对照组(χ~2=5.419,P<0.05),会阴水肿发生率低于观察组(Z=-2.377,P<0.05),差异有统计学意义,两组会阴裂伤程度(Z=-0.647,P>0.05)、产后2 h出血量(Z=-0.423,P>0.05)及新生儿窒息率(Z=-0.486,P>0.05),差异无统计学意义。结论无保护会阴接生技术减轻了产妇会阴损伤程度,没有造成明显的分娩并发症,值得在临床推广。 Objective To explore the effect of unprotected perineum delivery technique in spontaneous vaginal delivery in low risk primipara. Methods From January to March 2015,182 primipare with spontaneous vaginal delivery in the hospital with no episiotomy indication were randomly divided into observation group (n=86) and control group (n=96).Unprotected perineum delivery technique and routine delivery technique were adopted in the observation group and control group after the fetal head crowned. Perineal integrity rate, the degree of perineal laceration, perineal edema,the hemorrhage volume 2 h after deliver'fi newborn asphyxia situation were compared in two groups. Results Theperineal integrity rate was higher and perineal edema rate was lower in observation group than that in control group(P〈0.05). No significant difference was detected in the degree of perineal laceration, the hemorrhage volume 2 h after delivery; newborn asphyxia situation between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion Unprotected perineum delivery technique can decrease the degree injury of perineum, with no labor complications.
作者 黄柳红 明雅焜 HUANG Liuhong MING Yakun(Department of Obstetrics, Nanhai Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Foshan 528200, Chin)
出处 《分子影像学杂志》 2017年第1期106-108,共3页 Journal of Molecular Imaging
关键词 无保护会阴接生技术 会阴裂伤 阴道分娩 unprotected perineum delivery technique perineal laceration normal delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献64

  • 1季炳招,项永华.会阴Ⅱ度裂伤发生因素临床分析[J].浙江预防医学,1996,8(4):27-28. 被引量:2
  • 2董金林,倪美菊,朱钟治.会阴Ⅲ度撕裂50例分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,1996,12(3):153-154. 被引量:17
  • 3张晓华.152例产妇几种会阴损伤的临床应用评估[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(08Z):40-41. 被引量:18
  • 4Mahony R,O'Herlihy C,Foley ME.Correlation of perineal outcome at first and second vaginal deliveries[J].Ir Med J,2008,101 (10):302 -4.
  • 5Lowder JL,Burrows LJ,Krohn MA,et al.Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations:a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2007,196(4):344.e1-5.
  • 6Samarasekera DN,Bekhit MT,Preston JP,et al.Risk factors for anal sphincter disruption during child birth[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2009,394 (3):535-8.
  • 7Mikolajczyk RT,Zhang J,Troendle J,et al.Risk factors for birth canal lacerations in primiparous women[J].Am J Perinatol,2008,25(5):259 -64.
  • 8王木兰 王淑娟.软产道裂伤的相关因素及处理.安徽医学,1997,18(6):60-60.
  • 9Eskandar O,Shet D.Risk factors for 3rd and 4th degree perineal tear[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2009,29 (2):119 -22.
  • 10Enkin M W,ACP J Club,1996年,1卷,132页

共引文献367

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部