期刊文献+

腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除+回肠原位新膀胱术疗效分析 被引量:16

Oncological results of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:回顾分析腹腔镜下全膀胱切除+回肠原位新膀胱术的临床疗效与经验。方法:随访了2006年1月-2012年2月采用腹腔镜下根治性膀胱切除术+回肠原位新膀胱术治疗的87例患者,手术方法为腹腔镜下膀胱全切术+开放新膀胱构建及吻合,并对随访3年的临床数据进行总结分析。结果:大多数患者恢复良好,所有的新膀胱漏尿并发症均被有效处理;仅有1例患者因肠瘘行肠造口,3个月后行肠回纳;术后3年整体生存率为88.5%(77/87),无瘤生存率为92.2%(71/77);整体控尿功能及肾功能保护方面取得良好效果。结论:腹腔镜下根治性膀胱全切+回肠原位新膀胱术,具有良好的控尿功能和较好的保肾功能,可以明显提高患者生活质量。 Objective: To summarize the clinical curative effect and experience of orthotopic ileum bladder following radical cystectomy in the bladder cancer patients. Methods: January 2006 to February 2012,87 patients underwent radical cystectomy and orthotopic ileum bladder reconstruction,and summarize the 3 years clinical data of follow-up.Results: Most of the patients recovered well,all of the new bladder leakage complications were effective treated. Only one patient with major urinary leak required re-exploration with successful revision anastomosis. The 3-year survival rate after surgery was 88. 5%( 77 /87). The disease free survival proportion was 92. 2%( 71 /77). Effective daytime and nighttime urinary continence as well as renal function deterioration were great. Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical resection of bladder in situ ileum new bladder surgery has the good function of urinary continence and better protect renal function,significantly improving the patients quality of life.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2017年第5期765-768,共4页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 腹腔镜 膀胱癌 原位回肠膀胱术 laparoscopic bladder cancer orthotopic ileum bladder
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1张沂南,金讯波,夏庆华,蒋绍博,赵勇,李文娟.应用时间相关参数分析腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的学习曲线[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,2(2):26-29. 被引量:4
  • 2Oosterlinck W, Lobel B, Jakse G, et al. Guidelines on bladder cancer[J]. Eur Urol, 2002, 41(2) : 105 -112.
  • 3Stenzl A, Cowan NC, De Santis M, et al. The updated EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer[ J ]. Eur Urol, 2009, 55(4): 815-825.
  • 4Guillotreau J, Gam6 X, Mouzin M, et al. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: morbidity of laparoscopic versus open surgery [ J ]. J Urol, 2009, 181(2) : 554 -559.
  • 5Basillote JB, Abdelshehid C, Ahlering TE, et al. Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder: a comparison with the open approach[J]. J Urol, 2004, 172(2) : 489 -493.
  • 6Zheng W, Li XS, Song G, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic cys- tectomy with open cystectomy in perioperative characterictics: a single center of 110 cases report [ J ]. Transl Androl Urol, 2012, 1:4-8.
  • 7See WA, Cooper CS, Fisher RJ. Predictors of laparoscopic com- plications after formal training in laparoscopic surgery[ J]. JAMA, 1993, 270(22): 2689-2692.
  • 8Jaffe J, Castellucci S, Cathelineau X, et al. Robot-assisted lapa- roscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve [ J ]. Urology, 2009, 73(1) : 127 -133.
  • 9Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, et al. The learning curve for lapa- roscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study [J]. J Urol, 2010,184(6) : 2291 -2296.
  • 10Hayn MH, Hussain A, Mansour AM, et al. The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the international ro- botic cystectomy consortium [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58 (2) : 197 - 202.

共引文献29

同被引文献83

引证文献16

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部