期刊文献+

基于证据的课程与教学研究范式转型——第十四届上海国际课程论坛综述 被引量:7

Evidence-based Research on Curriculum and Instruction Review on the 14th Shanghai International Curriculum Forum
原文传递
导出
摘要 课程与教学研究是到了范式转型的时候了,要走向基于证据、面向实际问题解决的研究。基于证据的课程与教学研究强调证据及其研究成果的情境性效用,它并不排斥理论思辨,同时注重价值指引。本次论坛呈现了基于证据的课程与教学研究的多个案例,突出强调了这些研究的实践改善的目的。 It's time for curriculum and instruction research to shift paradigm, which should be based on evidence and solving practical problems, Evidence-based curriculum and instruction research emphasizes what evidence works and the situational utility of results. It does not reject the theory of speculation, but also focus on the value of the guidelines. This forum presents multiple cases of evidence-based curriculum and instructional research, highlighting the purpose of these studies aiming at practical improvement.
作者 虞天意 马志强 周文叶 YU Tianyi MA Zhiqiang Zhou Wenye(Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, Chin)
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期122-128,共7页 Global Education
关键词 证据 课程与教学 价值 evidence curriculum and instruction value
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献49

  • 1Ax, J. & Ponte, P. (2010). Moral issues in educational praxis: A perspective from pedagogiek and didactiek as human sciences in continental Europe. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(1), 29-42.
  • 2Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • 3Biesta, G. J.J. (2005). What can critical pedagogy learn from postmodernism? Further reflections on the impossible future of critical pedagogy. I. Gur Ze'ev (ed) , Critical theory and critical pedagogy today. Toward a new critical language in education. Haifa : Studies in Education (University of Haifa) ,pp. 143-159.
  • 4Biesta, G. J. J. (2007a). Why "what works" won't work. Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit of educational research. Educational Theory, 57 ( 1 ), 1-22.
  • 5Biesta, G. J.J. (2007b). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13 (3), 295-301.
  • 6Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Values and ideals in teachers' professional judgement. S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall & A. Cribb (eds). Changing teacher professionalism (pp. 184-193). London: Routledge.
  • 7Biesta, G. J.J. (2010a). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers.
  • 8Biesta, G. J.J. (20lOb). Five these on complexity reduction and its politics. D.C. Osberg & G. J.J. Biesta (Eds). Complexity theory and the politics of education. Rotterdam : Sense Publishers, pp. 5-14.
  • 9Biesta, G. J. J. ( in press). An alternative future for European educational research. Zeitschrift far Padagogische Historiographie.
  • 10Biesta, G. J.J. & Burbules, N. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

共引文献65

同被引文献146

引证文献7

二级引证文献133

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部