镇江市丹徒区酒后驾驶综合干预后1年效果评价

Efficacy Evaluation on health education of DUI after 1 year in Dantu district of Zhenjiang city

目的了解镇江市丹徒区综合干预酒后驾驶效果。方法采用路边随机拦截呼气酒精测试及问卷调查的方式,分别在干预前后调查驾驶员,比较酒驾率的变化。结果基线调查的2014年,调查1 322名驾驶员中,酒驾率为2.87%;比较不同驾车时间、车辆类型、出行目的、饮酒频率及是否知道酒驾最低血液酒精浓度等,差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。在加强健康教育与执法干预1年后的2015年,调查1 328名驾驶员中,酒驾率为1.05%;比较不同车辆类型、是否知道酒驾最低血液酒精浓度等,差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。干预前后调查的酒驾均为轻度酒后驾驶,酒驾率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论丹徒区酒驾综合干预后酒驾率下降,但酒驾依然存在,需继续加强干预措施。

Objective To evaluate efficacy after multi-department intervention in Dantu district of Zhenjiang city.MethodsRandom roadside breath testing for alcohol and questionnaire based survey on drivers were conducted before and after intervention;the DUI rates were compared.Results A total of 1 322 drivers were investigated for baseline survey in 2014,the DUI rate was 2.87%.Statistical difference of DUI rates was observed among different groups of drivers with different driving time,vehicle types,trip purposes,drinking frequencies and whether being aware of minimum blood alcohol concentration for DUI definition（all P〈0.05）.1year after health promotion and enforcement intervention,a total of 1 328 drivers were investigated for efficacy evaluation,resulting DUI rate of 1.05%.Statistical difference of DUI rates was observed among different groups of drivers with different vehicle types and whether being aware of minimum blood alcohol concentration for DUI definition（all P〈0.05）.All DUI were minor drink-driving,the DUI rates were statistically different before and after intervention（P〈0.05）.Conclusion The DUI rate decreased after intervention in Dantu district;however,DUI phenomenon was still exist,which required strengthened implementation of intervention measures.