期刊文献+

X-Stop及Wallis系统植入对腰椎结构的影响比较 被引量:2

Comparison of Lumbar Changes after X-Stop System and Wallis System Implantationm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较X-Stop及Wallis系统内固定植入对腰椎间盘退变性疾病患者腰椎结构的影响。方法 2011年12月至2015年12月期间收治腰椎间盘退行疾病患者80例,依据随机数字表法将患者分为两组:A组40例患者病变节段减压后植入X-Stop系统,B组40例病变节段减压后植入Wallis系统,比较两组患者的手术疗效及腰椎结构变化。结果两组患者手术时间和出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但A组内固定植入时间显著低于B组(P<0.05);两组患者治疗后VAS评分和ODI评分显著下降(P<0.05),但组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手术后,两组患者的Cobb角、椎间孔横径/下位椎体高度、椎间孔纵径/下位椎体高度和椎间隙高度/下位椎体高度显著增加(P<0.05);A组患者术后椎间隙高度/下位椎体高度显著高于B组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后L_(4~5)节段活动度ROM值降低(P<0.05),但B组下降更为明显(P<0.05);两组患者手术前后颅侧和尾侧的Woodend评分无明显变化(P>0.05),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访1年,两组患者的手术效果满意,恢复良好,均无感染、神经损伤、内固定断裂或松动、硬膜囊破裂等并发症发生。结论 X-Stop及Wallis系统内固定植入均能有效恢复患者腰椎生理曲度,增加椎间隙高度和椎间孔面积,安全性和有效性良好,但X-Stop在增加椎间隙高度方面效果更优,操作更为简便。 Objective To compare the postoperative changes of lumbar structure after implanting X-Stopsystem and Wallis system.Methods 80 patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease from December 2011 to December 2015 were randomly divided into two groups:group A was implanted with X-Stop system,group B was implanted with X-Stop system.We compared the efficacy and lumbar structure changes.Results There was no significant difference in operative time and blood loss between two groups(P〉0.05),but implantation time of group A was significantly lower than group B(P〈0.05);After treatment,VAS score and ODI score decreased significantly(P〈0.05),but there was no statistically significant difference between two groups(P〉0.05).After surgery,patients' Cobb angle,intervertebral foramen diameter,longitudinal diameter/lower vertebral height and the disc height/lower vertebral height increased significantly(P〈0.05)in both groups.And the isc height/lower vertebral height in group A was significantly higher than group B after treatment,(P〈0.05);L_(4~5) segmental motion ROM value decreased after surgery(P〈0.05),but group B decreased more significantly(P〈0.05).There was no significant change in Woodend points before and after surgery in two groups(P〉0.05),and no statistically significant difference between two groups(P〉0.05).During 1-year follow-up,patients were satisfied with surgery affect,and had a good recovery,there were no significant complications such as infection,nerve damage,fixation failure or dural sac rupture occured.Conclusion Both of X-Stop system and Wallis system are safe and effective which can effectively restore lumbar lordosis,increase the height of intervertebral space and intervertebral foramen area,but the X-Stop is more effective compared to the Wallis in increasing the height of the intervertebral space.
出处 《实用骨科杂志》 2017年第1期1-4,8,共5页 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
关键词 X-Stop系统 Wallis系统 腰椎间盘 腰椎结构 X-Stop system wallissystem lumbar interveterbral disc lumbar structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献126

  • 1翁习生,邱贵兴,李军伟,赵宏,仉建国,沈建雄,林进.椎弓根螺钉翻修术[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(9):515-519. 被引量:26
  • 2王永惕,陈增海,李牧,郑燕平.腰椎管扩大成形术──椎板截骨再植与棘突植骨的临床应用[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(10):644-647. 被引量:70
  • 3郭志良,周跃,成敏,李华壮,曹国永,张伟,李兴鑫.周期性张应变对椎间盘纤维环细胞内游离钙离子浓度的影响[J].第三军医大学学报,2006,28(11):1212-1214. 被引量:5
  • 4王宏伟,吴继功,海涌,刘晓潭,王起印.两种融合方式治疗腰椎滑脱的比较[J].中国现代医生,2007,45(08X):39-40. 被引量:1
  • 5Kabir SM, Gupta SR, Casey AT. Lumbar interspinous spacers: a systematic review of clinical and biomechanical evidence. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) ,2010,35 : E1499-1506.
  • 6Wilke HJ, Drumm J, H:iussler K, et al. Biomechanics of interspinous spacers. Orthopade, 2010,39:565-572.
  • 7Hartmann F, Dietz SO, Kuhn S, et al. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2011,78:404-409. S.
  • 8andu N, Schaller B, Arasho B, et al. Wallis interspinous implantation to treat degenerative spinal disease : description of the method and case series. Expert Rev Neurother, 2011,11: 799- 807.
  • 9Wilke HJ, Drumm J, Haussler K, et al. Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiseal pressure. Eur Spine J, 2008,17 : 1049-1056.
  • 10TambmTelli FC, Proietti L, Logroscino CA. Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J, 2011,20 Suppl 1 :S27-35.

共引文献80

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部