期刊文献+

组织公平在多层辱虐管理中的角色:基于道德排除理论的多视角分析 被引量:12

A multiple model of abusive supervision based on moral exclusion theory:The role of organizational justice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,辱虐管理引起了组织行为研究者的重点关注。已有的研究主要在个体层次上分析辱虐管理对于下属的作用机制及消极影响,但组织层次上的研究还鲜有学者涉及。从领导、受害者和旁观者等多个视角,基于道德排除理论,分析梳理了辱虐管理对于组织公平的作用,整合构建了多层次辱虐管理对下属影响的组织公平作用机制模型,并分别从组织层次、个体层次以及组织层次对个体层次交互作用的角度,深入探讨了辱虐管理对下属产生的负面作用。建议未来的研究考虑辱虐管理中的文化因素,进一步在其他组织公平的维度上研究辱虐管理的作用机制,改进并完善现有的研究方法,探索辱虐管理的积极应对策略,并从工具性的视角关注领导实施辱虐管理的动因。 In recent years, abusive supervision has received increasing attention from organizational behavior researchers. However, previous studies have primarily focused on how ab usive supervision negatively affects individuals and the underlying mechanism, with few examining this topic on the organizational level. Based on moral exclusion theory, we illustrated the effect of abusive supervision on organizational justice, and established a conceptual multilevel model explaining the effect of abusive supervision on employees through organizational justice. In addition, we discussed the effects of abusive supervision at both individual and organizational levels, as well as the cross-level effects. Our discussion also integrated leaders', targets', and bystanders' angles. We suggest that future studies explore the role of culture in abusive supervision research, investigate the role of other organizational justice dimensions on the effects of abusive supervision, and improve existing research methods. Further, we encourage researchers to explore positive coping strategies against abusive supervision, and to examine the motives for leaders to engage in abusive supervision.
作者 严瑜 张振嘉 YAN Yu ZHANG Zhenjia(Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Chin)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期145-155,共11页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 湖北省教育科学规划2016年度课题(2016GB002)
关键词 辱虐管理 道德排除理论 组织公平 多视角 多层次 abusive supervision moral exclusion theory organizational justice multi-level multi-perspective
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献74

  • 1Aquino, K., & Bradfield, M. (2000). Perceived victimizationin the workplace: The role of situational factors and victim characteristics. Organization Science, 11(5), 525-537.
  • 2Aquino, K., & Bommer, W. H. (2003). Preferential mistreatment: How victim status moderates the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and workplace victimization. Organization Science, 14(4), 374-385.
  • 3Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191-201.
  • 4Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y., Chan, Z. X. G., & Debrah, Y. A. (2008) Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 393-411.
  • 5Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755-778.
  • 6Bamberger, E A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59(6), 723-752.
  • 7Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Handbook of work stress. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • 8Breaux, D. M., Perrew6, P. L., Hall, A. T., Frink, D. D., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Time to try a little tenderness7 The detrimental effects of accountability when coupled with abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 111-122.
  • 9Burton, J. P., & Hoobler, J. M. (2011). Aggressive reactions to abusive supervision: The role of interactional justice and narcissism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(4), 389-398.
  • 10Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Perrew6, P. L., & Whitten, D. (2011). The fallout from abusive supervision: An examination of subordinates and their partners. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 937-961.

共引文献39

同被引文献139

引证文献12

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部