期刊文献+

鸭源弯曲菌的分离鉴定及其耐药性、毒力基因分析 被引量:5

Isolation,antimicrobial resistance profile and virulence gene analysis of Campylobacter spp.originated from duck
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解鸭肉生产链中弯曲菌的污染情况及其耐药性和毒力基因分布情况。方法根据GB 4789.9-2014,从肉鸭屠宰链中分离疑似弯曲菌,采用三重PCR方法,对疑似菌株进行准确鉴定;采用微量肉汤稀释法,对弯曲菌分离菌株进行8种抗菌药物敏感性试验,参考NARMS标准判定药敏试验结果;利用PCR检测与弯曲菌致病相关的4个毒力基因。结果根据形态特征、生化指标及PCR鉴定结果,从489份样品中,鉴定出空肠弯曲菌100株、结肠弯曲菌79株,其他弯曲菌8株,弯曲菌的总体分离率为38.24%,肉鸭屠宰前、脱毛环节、掏膛环节、屠宰后样品弯曲菌分离率分别为76.33%、5.62%、24.00%、0%;药敏试验结果表明弯曲菌对TET(95.72%)、CLI(90.91%)的耐药率较高,对AZI(63.64%)耐药率居中,对CIP(31.02%)、GEN(34.76%)、NAL(37.43%)、ERY(41.18%)、CHL(41.18%)的耐药率相对较低,所分离菌株多重耐药现象较为普遍,多重耐药率达72.19%。弯曲菌分离株对黏附相关基因cadF、鞭毛基因flaA、侵袭蛋白基因iamA、毒素调节基因cdtB的携带率分别为100%、80.75%、71.12%、94.65%。结论肉鸭屠宰过程中存在不同程度的弯曲菌污染,且其耐药情况较为严重,毒力相关基因广泛存在于弯曲菌中,应该加强卫生管理和抗菌药物使用监督。 To investigate the contamination conditions of Campylobacter spp. in duck production chain and its antimicrobial resistance, virulence gene distribution, samples were collected at the duck slaughterhouse according to GB 4789.9-2014. Trip- lex PCR assay was applied to identify the species of Campylobacter and the recovered Carnpylobacter strains were tested for the antimicrobial susceptibility against 8 kinds of antimicrobial agents using a broth microdilution method, the susceptibility results were determined according to the NARMS criteria (2011). Subsequently, 4 virulence genes were detected by PCR method. The result showed that 187 Campylobacter isolates were obtained from 489 samples, including 160 C. jejuni, 130 C. coli and10 unidentified Campylobacter isolates. The total isolation rate of Campylobacter was 38. 24%. The prevalence of Campylobacter before slaughtering, at depilation stage, evis- ceration stage and duck products was 76. 33%, 5. 62%, 24.00%, and 0%, respectively. The Campylobacter isolates were most frequently resistant to tetracycline (95.72 %), fol- lowed by resistance to clindamycin(90. 91% ), the resistance rate of azithromycin (63.64%) was in the middle, the resist- ance rates of eiprofloxacin(31.02%), gentamicin(34. 76%), nalidixic acid ( 3 7. 43 %), erythromycin ( 41. 18 % ), chloram-phenicol (41.18%) were relatively low. The multi-drug resistance was common among Campylobacter isolates with a rate of 72.19%. The prevalence of adhesion-associated gene cadF, flagellin gene flaA, invasion associated protein gene iarnA, toxin regulation gene cdtB was 100%, 80. 75%, 71.12% and 94.65%, respectively. The results indicated that the Campylobacter contamination occurred in the slaughtering procedures of duck, and the antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolates was relatively serious. In addition, the virulence-associated genes were detected widely among Campylobacter isolates. Therefore, the supervision of antimicrobial agents using at rearing stage should be strengthened, along with health management in duck production chain.
出处 《中国人兽共患病学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期15-21,共7页 Chinese Journal of Zoonoses
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(No.31400066) 公益性行业(农业)科研专项子课题(No.200903055)联合资助~~
关键词 肉鸭屠宰链 空肠弯曲菌 结肠弯曲菌 耐药性 毒力基因 duck slaughter chain Campylobacterjejuni Campylobacter coli antimicrobial resistance virulence genes
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献26

  • 1杨毓环,马群飞,陈伟伟,洪锦春,林升清.福建省2003-2005年食品中空肠和结肠弯曲菌的监测与分析[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2007,19(1):15-18. 被引量:15
  • 2邵碧英,陈彬,汤敏英,吴谦,张体银.沙门氏菌多重PCR检测方法的建立[J].食品科学,2007,28(10):489-492. 被引量:33
  • 3Wataru Y, uation of a and simple coli[J]. J 1099/jmm. Masumi T, Masanori I, et al. Development and eval- loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay {or rapid detection of Campylobacterjejuni and Campylobacter Med MicrobioI, 2008, 57(4): 444-451. DOI:10. 0. 47688-0.
  • 4Alfredson DA, Korolik V. Antibiotic resistance and resistance mechanisms in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli [J]. FEMSMicrobiolLett, 2007, 277(2): 123-132. DOI: 10. 1111/j. 1574-6968. 2007. 00935. x.
  • 5Mozina SS, Kurincic M, Klancnik A, et al. Campylobacter and its multi-resistance in the food chain[J]. Trends Food Sci Techn- ol, 2010, 22(2-3): 91-98. DOI: 10.1016/j. tifs. 2010. 09. 003.
  • 6Mukhopadhyaya BB, Hishya SK. Incidence of colibacillosis in chicks in some poultry pockets of west Bengal[J]. Indian J Poul Sci, 1992, 27(2): 103-107.
  • 7Denis M, Soumet C, Rivoal K, et al. Development of a m-PCR assay for simultaneous identification of Campylobacter j ejuni and C. coli[J]. Lett Appl Microbiol, 1999, 29: 406-410. DOI:10. 1046/j. 1472-765X. 1999. 00658. x.
  • 8Isabel M, Susana AS, Elsa J, et al. Comparative study of DNA extraction methods for soybean derived food products[J]. Food Ctrl, 2008, 19(12), 1183-1190. DOI, 10. 1046/j. 1365-2672. 2001. 01380. x.
  • 9Clinical and Laboratory Standars Institute. Performance Stand- ards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Twentith Informa- tional Supplement[S]. M100-$20. 2010.
  • 10Chen X, Naren GW, Wu CM, et al. Prevalence and antimicro- bial resistance o{ Campylobacter isolates in broilers {rom China [J]. VetMicrobiol, 2010, 144(1-2): 133-139. DOI: 10.1016/ j. vetmic. 2009.12. 035.

共引文献7

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部