期刊文献+

自制无菌手套软性Trocar经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术及医护配合的临床研究 被引量:2

Clinical Efficacy of Transumbilical Single-port Access Using Self-made Sterile Glove Soft Trocar Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Medical Cooperation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨自制无菌手套软性Trocar经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾炎切除术的安全性及疗效,总结手术配合方法。方法:对2015年1月-2016年1月110例急性阑尾炎病例按随机数字表法分为SSLA组50例,CLA组60例,比较两组临床疗效及总结手术配合经验。结果:全部患者均镜下完成,无中转开腹或增加穿刺孔,SSLA组患者术后肠道功能恢复早于CLA组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.0002)。但两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院总费用及术中术后并发症比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后随访1~6个月,均未发现阑尾残株炎、阑尾残端瘘、肠粘连梗阻等远期并发症。结论:自制无菌手套软性Trocar经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术安全、有效,美容效果好,具有可行性,其临床应用价值仍需进一步的临床研究证实,良好的医护配合起到重要作用。 Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of transumbilical single-port access using selfmade sterile glove soft Trocar laparoscopic appendectomy and medical cooperation summary.Method:110 patients with acute appendicitis admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 were divided into SSLA group of 50 patients and CLA group of 60 patients according to the random number table method.The clincal efficacy was compared between the two groups and sum up the experience of operation cooperation.Result:All the surgeries were completed under iaparoscopy,no case converted to laparotomy or additional trocar.Patients in the SSLA group recovery normal bowel activity earlier than those in the CLA group(P=0.0002).However,the operation time,intraoperative bleeding amount,postoperative length of stay,total hospital costs,intraoperative and postoperative complication had no obviously statistical difference between two groups(P〉0.05).Followed up for 1-6 months,no appendix stump inflammation,appendiceal stump fistula,adhesive intestinal obstruction or other remote complication appeared.Conclusion:Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy access using self-made sterile glove soft Trocar is safe and feasible,while its clinical application needs further study,favorable medical cooperation plays an important role.
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2017年第1期125-127,共3页 Medical Innovation of China
基金 广州市番禺区科技工业商务和信息化局项目(2015-Z03-15)
关键词 阑尾切除术 腹腔镜 单孔 软性Trocar Appendectomy Laparoscopy Single-port Soft Trocar
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献107

  • 1朱仁武,姜阳贵,赵茂森,沈淑蓉,吴显光,顾叶春.三孔线扎法腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1169-1170. 被引量:7
  • 2江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133. 被引量:1350
  • 3黎介寿.对Fast-track Surgery(快通道外科)内涵的认识[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(8):515-517. 被引量:364
  • 4Liang JT, Huang KC, I_,ai HS, et al. OncoLogic resuLts of Lapa- roscopic versus conventionaL open surgery for stage Ⅱ -Ⅲ Left osided colon cancers : a randomized controlled triaL [J] . Ann Surg OncoL, 2007,14 (1) : 109.
  • 5Masoomi H,Nguyen NT,Dolirh MO,et al. Comparison oflaparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated andperforated appendicitis in the obese population. Am J Surg,2011 ,202:733-738.
  • 6Yagnik VD,Halhod JB,Phalak AG. A retrospective study of two-port appendectomy and its comparison with open appendectomy and three-port appendecloiny. Saudi J Gaslroenterol,2010,16:268-271.
  • 7Suttie SA,Seth S,Driver CP,et al. Outcome after intra-and extra-coiporeal laparoscopic1 appendeclomv techniques. Surg Kndosc,2004,18:1123-1125.
  • 8Marescaux J,Dallemagne B,Perrelta S,et al. Surgery wilhoutscars:report of transluminal chiolecystectoniy in a human heing.Arch Surg,2007,142:823-826.
  • 9Saber AA,El-Ghazuly TH ,Dcwoolkar AV ,et al. Single-incisionlaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional multiportlaparoscopic sleeve gaslreclomy:technical considerations andstralegic modifications. Surg Ohes Relat Dis,2010,6:658-664.
  • 10Lee J,Baek J,Kim W. Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy:initial experience and comparison with three-portappendeciomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2010,20 :100-J03.

共引文献144

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部