期刊文献+

微创股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折临床分析 被引量:8

Clinical Study of Minimally Invasive Proximal Femoral Nail in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析微创股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果。方法将2015年3月-2016年3月在我院进行治疗的50例老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者计算机随机分成两组作为研究对象,每组25例。观察组采取微创股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗,对照组实施动力髋螺钉治疗。比较两组患者的手术用时、术中出血量、术后引流量、住院天数、骨折愈合时间、不同阶段的Harris评分及并发症发生率。结果与对照组患者相比,观察组患者的手术用时、住院天数、骨折愈合时间更短,术中出血量及术后引流量更少,并发症发生率更低,治疗后一个月的Harris评分更高(P<0.05)。结论微创股骨近端防旋髓内钉是治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的有效方法。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect of minimally invasive proximal femoral nail in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Methods 50 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture who were treated in our hospital from March 2015 to March 2016 were randomly divided into two groups as the research object, with a total of 25 cases. The observation group was treated with minimally invasive proximal femur anti rotation intramedullary nail, while the control group was treated with dynamic hip screw. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris score at different stages and complications were compared between the 2 groups. Results Compared with the control group, the observation groupof patients with operation time, hospitalization time, healing time is shorter than the fracture flow, less bleeding and postoperative drainage, lower complication rates, one month after treatment Harris score higher(P〈0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive proximal femoral nail is an effective method for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.
作者 刘平
机构地区 一汽总医院骨科
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2017年第2期121-122,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 微创股骨近端防旋髓内钉 老年 股骨粗隆间骨折 minimally invasive proximal femoral nail senile intertrochanteric fracture
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献81

  • 1张保中,邱贵兴.高龄股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(8):582-584. 被引量:133
  • 2周青,沈云.股骨转子间骨折两种髓内固定方法的比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(8):730-733. 被引量:54
  • 3安智全,王烨明,曾炳芳.经皮穿针导入股骨近端髓内钉内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的前瞻性研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(9):816-819. 被引量:44
  • 4Ho M, Garau G, Walley G,et al. Minimally invasive dynamic hip screw for fixation of hip fractures[ J]. Int Orthop ,2009,2:555.
  • 5Boldin C, Seibert FJ. The proximal femoral nail(PFN) , a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures [ J ]. Acta Orthop Scand ,2003,74:53 - 58.
  • 6Xu Y, Geng D, Yang H, et al. Treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures : comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirota- tion and gamma nail 3 [J]. Orthopedics, 2010, 33(7) : 473.
  • 7Mereddy P, Kamath S, Ramakrishnan M, et al. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) : a new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures [ J ]. Injury, 2009, 40(4) : 428 -432.
  • 8Sehat KR, Evans R, Newman JH. How much blood is lost in total knee arthroplasty. Correct blood loss management should take hid- den loss into account [J]. Knee, 2000, 7(3) : 151 -155.
  • 9McConnell J, Dillon J, Kinninmonth A, et al. Blood loss following total knee replacement is reduced when using computer-assisted ver- sus standard methods [ J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2012, 78 ( 1 ) : 75 - 79.
  • 10Gross JB. Estimating allowable blood loss: corrected for dilution [.1]. Anesthesiolozv. 1983. 58(3) : 277-280.

共引文献275

同被引文献34

引证文献8

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部