血液灌流中两种不同预冲方法的效果比较

Comparison of Two Different Pre-flushing Methods in Liquid Perfusion

目的探讨两种不同预冲方法对血液灌流预冲效果的影响。方法选取100例需行血液灌流的患者作为研究对象,将其随机分为常规预冲组和改良预冲组,两组分别采用不同的方法进行血液灌流器的预冲,对预冲时间、预冲肝素用量及治疗中及治疗中管路和灌流器的凝血情况进行统计分析。结果改良预冲组在治疗时间、管路与灌流器凝血情况以及肝素使用量3项指标上,均优于常规预冲组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论改良后的预冲方法减少了预冲时间,提高了工作效率,减少了肝素用量,灌流器凝血发生率并没有增加,能正常顺利完成血液灌流的治疗。

Objective To investigate the effect of two different preflushing methods on the preflushing effect of hemoperfusion. Methods 100 cases underwent hemoperfusion were randomly divided into routine group, two groups were using different methods for hemoperfusion pre-flushing, coagulation pipeline and perfusion of pre washing time, pre-flushing heparin dosage and treatment and treatment for statistical analysis. Results The improvement group was better than the conventional group in 3 indexes of the treatment time, the blood coagulation of the pipeline and the perfusion device and the dosage of heparin, the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The improved priming method reduces the precharge time, improve work efficiency, reduce the amount of heparin, perfusion coagulation does not increase the incidence of normal, successfully completed the treatment of hemoperfusion.