期刊文献+

两种公平偏好模型下的供应链定价决策与利润分析 被引量:3

Analysis of Pricing-Decisions and Profits of Supply Chain under Two Kinds of Fairness Preference Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 将公平偏好理论引入一对一两级供应链运作之中,以零售商和制造商均为公平中性时的决策结果为参照,分别基于FS模型和BO模型研究零售商公平偏好对供应链定价决策和利润的影响.结果表明:两种模型下零售商的定价决策保持不变;但BO模型与FS模型零售商存在有利不公平厌恶偏好下,制造商的最优批发价格均大于零售商公平中性时的情形,导致零售商的最优利润小于其公平中性时的情形;FS模型零售商存在不利不公平厌恶偏好时,制造商采取批发让价行为,零售商获得比其公平中性时更多的供应链利润. The fairness theory is incorporated in a two-level supply chain and game results while the retailer and the manufacturer are fairness neutral as a reference. This paper stud- ies how the fairness preference will influence the pricing-decisions and profits of supply chain based on FS model and BO model respectively. The results show that the retailer's pricingdecisions remain the same compared with fairness neutral situation under two models. The manufacturers optimal wholesale prices are greater than fairness neutral situation tlnder BO model and the situation of advantage inequity aversion under FS model, which lead to the retailer's optimal profit is less than its fairness neutral situation. At the situation of disad- vantage inequity aversion under FS model, the manufacturer will make a reduction and the retailer gets more profit of supply chain.
作者 李俊 林强 LI Jun LIN Qiang(School of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing 400067, Chin)
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 北大核心 2016年第24期127-134,共8页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 重庆市教委科学技术研究项目(KJ1601409 KJ1601411)
关键词 公平偏好 供应链 定价决策 STACKELBERG博弈 fairness preference supply chain pricing-decision stackelberg game
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献100

  • 1刘树人,黄颖娜,陈丽丽.公平关切下的供应链库存与定价决策[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(S2):474-479. 被引量:13
  • 2阮青松,黄向晖.西方公平偏好理论研究综述[J].外国经济与管理,2005,27(6):10-16. 被引量:22
  • 3魏光兴,覃燕红,蒲勇健.联合契约:基于公平心理偏好的行为博弈分析[J].系统工程,2006,24(9):32-37. 被引量:12
  • 4Andreoni,Miller.Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma:Experimental Evidence[J],Economic Journal,1993 (103):570~585.
  • 5Andreoni,Vesterlund.Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism[J],Quarterly Journal of Economics,2001 (90):131~142.
  • 6Berg,Dickhaut,McCabe.Trust,Reciprocity and Social History[J],Games and Economic Behavior,1995 (Ⅹ):122~142.
  • 7Blount.When Social Outcomes aren't Fair:the Effect of Causal Attributions on Preferences[J],Organizational Behaviors and Human Decision Process,1995 (LⅩⅢ):131~144.
  • 8Bolle,Kritikos.Self-Centered Inequity Aversion versus Reciprocity and Altruism[Z],University of Viadrina,Working Paper,2000.
  • 9Bolton,Ockenfels.ERC:A Theory of Equity,Reciprocity and Competition[J],American Economic Review,2000,100 (20):166~193.
  • 10Camerer.Progress in Behavioral Game Theory[J],Jounal of Economic Perpective,1997 (11):167~188.

共引文献102

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部