期刊文献+

清代思想的异调:王船山政治哲学再探 被引量:2

A Different Voice in Qing Thought:Revisiting the Political Philosophy of Wang Fuzhi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近代以来人们对于船山的理解,往往受到两个前见的影响:一是重视船山的民族论,将之作为排满革命的理论宣传;一是将船山看作启蒙的思想家。特别是后者,即启蒙的论调一直是中国明末至清代思想史的一个主流论调。但我们稽诸《船山全书》,并不能发现很多真正的'启蒙'思想;反而,在这样一个准启蒙的思想潮流中,船山显得不免'反动'。阳明后学与清代考据学,虽然形态不同,乃至相互对立,但他们都是传统等差结构的消解者;而船山恰恰是这样一个结构的维护者。船山的人性论、伦理学,都是基于此而展开的。 Understandings of Wang Fuzhi in modern China have been prone to the influence of two preexisting notions. One highlights his ethnic theory and uses it to promote the antiManchu revolution, and the other regards him as an Enlightenment thinker. However, an examination of his Complete Works of Wang Fuzhi shows that it contains little Enlightenment thought and instead shows Wang as something of a reactionary in the context of the enlightening trends of his day. Both the philosophical legacy of Wang Yangming and Qing text-critical research, though different or even opposite in form, functioned to deconstruct the traditional rank hierarchy, whereas Wang Fuzhi was a defender of hierarchy and took it as the basis for his theory of human nature and ethics.
出处 《孔学堂》 2016年第4期82-89,共8页 Confucian Academy
关键词 日生日成 躐等 政治哲学 王船山 清代思想 Wang Fuzhi political philosophy growing and attaining completion daily skipping over necessary steps
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1余英时.宋明理学与政治文化[M].长春:吉林出版集团,2008:3.
  • 2郭庆藩.庄子集释[M].北京:中华书局,2004..
  • 3张岱年.中国哲学大纲[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1982.13.
  • 4张载.张载集[M].北京:中华书局,1978..
  • 5王晓毅.王弼评传[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1996.
  • 6包弼德.历史上的理学[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2010.
  • 7瓦格纳.王粥老子注研究[M].杨立华,译.南京:江苏人民出版社.2009.
  • 8周敦颐.通书[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.
  • 9谷继明.易学诠释学模式下的北宋理学[J].周易研究,2008(1):37-42. 被引量:2

同被引文献8

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部