期刊文献+

中文版免疫抑制药物依从性Basel评估量表在肝移植受者中应用的信效度研究 被引量:11

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Basel assessment of adherence to immunosuppressive medication scale in accessing liver transplant recipients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的将免疫抑制药物依从性Basel评估量表引入我国,并研究中文版免疫抑制药物依从性Basel评估量表在肝移植受者中应用的信效度。方法选取北京市某三级甲等医院移植随访门诊就诊的肝移植受者为研究对象。在征得量表研发方同意后,对量表进行跨文化调试。首先对量表进行翻译和回译,再根据专家委员会的意见对量表进行修改。并在正式调查前,对修改后的量表进行预调查。通过内在一致性信度以及2周重测信度对量表进行信度分析;通过探索性因子分析对其进行效度研究。结果量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.697,重测信度为0.964;探索性因子分析提取了1个公因子,共解释54.73%的总方差变异。结论免疫抑制药物依从性Basel评估量表条目设置简明,在肝移植受者中应用信效度均较好。 Objective To introduce Basel Assessment of Adherence to immunesuppressive medication scale(BAASIS) to China, then to test its reliability and validity. Methods After obtaining authorization from the developer,the BAASIS was translated and culturally adapted into Chinese version and then the va- lidity and reliability were tested in liver transplant recipients,who were selected from liver transplantation center of a general hospital in Beijing. To modify Chi- nese version based on the amendments from experts committee and the preliminary investigation. Reliability was tested by internal consistency reliability and test - rest reliability,and using explore factor analysis to test validity. Results The Cronbach's α of Chinese version of BAASIS was 0.697 and test - rest reliability was 0.964. Factor analysis got 1 factor, which could explain 54.73% of the total variance. Conclusion Chinese version of BAASLS is reliable and valid, and it a concise tool wich can be used for assessment and measurement of immunesuppressive medication adherence in Chinese settings.
出处 《护理管理杂志》 2017年第1期17-19,共3页 Journal of Nursing Administration
基金 北京市自然科学基金(7142098)
关键词 信度 效度 药物依从性 肝移植 受者 reliability validity medication adherence liver transplantation recipient
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献44

  • 1唐小妮,薛武军,顾炜.肾移植术后病人依从性的调查研究[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(1):19-21. 被引量:40
  • 2阎成美,陶小琴,马予洁,杨晓玲.全程健康教育对肾移植患者定期门诊随访依从性的影响[J].护理管理杂志,2006,6(5):47-48. 被引量:26
  • 3Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 4Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 5Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 6Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 7Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 8Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 9Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 10Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.

共引文献1020

同被引文献86

引证文献11

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部