摘要
目的:探索封包疗法联合祛疣方外泡治疗跖疣的临床效果。方法选择跖疣101例患者作为研究对象,知情同意后,按数字表法随机分入观察组与对照组,其中观察组49例,对照组52例,观察组采用封包疗法联合祛疣方外泡治疗,对照组单独采用祛疣方外泡治疗,于治疗4周后,比较两组间主要临床症状、有效率的差别,并于患者痊愈停止治疗后,随访8周,分析比较两组间的复发率。结果治疗4周后,观察组与对照组间的皮损、疼痛程度差异均有统计学意义(Z=4.48,P<0.05;Z=4.18,P<0.05);观察组和对照组有效率分别为85.71%和48.08%,两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=16.00,P<0.001);观察组和对照组复发率分别为13.33%和27.27%,两组差异有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论封包疗法联合祛疣方外泡治疗跖疣的临床效果优于单独采用祛疣方外泡治疗。
Objective To explore the clinical effects of the packet therapy combined with Chinese prescrip-tion soaking in the treatment of patients with verruca plantaris,so as to provide clinical guidance and basis.Methods 101 patients with verruca plantaris were chosen as study objects,and they were divided into two groups,namely obser-vation group and control group.Observation group was treated by the packet therapy combined with Chinese prescrip-tion soaking,and control group was treated by Chinese prescription soaking.When they were cured for 4 weeks,the main symptoms and effective rate in the two groups were calculated and compared.For the recovery patients,when their drugs were withdrew for 8 weeks,the recurrence rate between the observation group and control group was compared.Results After being treated for 4 weeks,both of the skin lesion and pain degree between the observation group and control group had significant differences (Z=4.48,P〈0.05;Z=4.18,P〈0.05).The effective rates in the observation group and control group were 85.71% and 48.08%,respectively,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2 =16.00,P〈0.001).The recurrence rates in the observation group and control group were 13.33% and 27.27%,respectively,and the difference between the two groups was no statistically signifi-cant (P〉0.05).Conclusion The packet therapy combined with Chinese prescription soaking is more effective than Chinese prescription soaking.
出处
《中国基层医药》
CAS
2017年第2期271-274,共4页
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
疣
封包疗法
祛疣方
Warts
Packet therapy
Chinese prescription soaking