摘要
本文对借口逻辑学是"必然地得出"并以此否认中国古代有逻辑的做法进行了反驳,回应了"中国无逻辑论",从而捍卫了"中国有逻辑论"。依据中国古代思想家对推类"必然性"的认识和推类"必然地得出"的"机理"分析,本文说明了中国古代逻辑也含有"必然性"的推理。推类,反映了中国人有机整体思维的显著特点,是中国传统文化的产物。我们讨论推类是否有"必然性"的问题,决不能撇开中国传统文化中的"类同理同"观念。这是推类的根本依据,也是正确把握推类"必然性"的关键所在。
This paper refutes the denial of ancient Chinese logic at the excuse of logic be- ing "necessarily obtained", criticizing the view of China' s lack of logic ideas and safeguarding the ground of China' s logic ideas. By means of understand- ing the "necessarily obtained" inferences in ancient Chinese logic and the mechanism concerned, we intend to argue that "necessarily obtained" infer- ences exist in ancient Chinese logic and that inferences reflect overall organic Chinese thinking as a product of traditional Chinese culture. It is deemed that the "category classification" concept should not be abandoned when discussing whether inferences are "necessarily obtained".
出处
《贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2017年第1期127-135,共9页
Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science
基金
国家社科基金重大招标项目"八卷<中国逻辑史>"[项目编号:14ZDB013]子课题"中国逻辑的深化发展"
关键词
推类
必然地得出
类同理同
机理
inference
necessarily obtained
category classification
mechanism