社交焦虑个体被放逐后对潜在社交机会的反应偏差

Reaction Bias Following Ostracism Towards Potential Social Opportunities in Social Anxiety Individuals

目的:本研究旨在探究遭遇放逐后,社交焦虑个体对不同类型的潜在社交机会(陌生人/好友/网络社交)的反应偏差。方法:通过简明版惧怕否定评价量表筛选高、低社交焦虑被试共110名,随机分配到放逐组(58人)或控制组(52人),通过网络虚拟掷球任务对其分别进行放逐或控制操纵。使用基本心理需求满足量表、改编版社交兴趣问卷以及志愿时间募集任务对所有被试予以测量。结果:两因素方差分析表明,在潜在交往对象为陌生人的志愿时间上,社交焦虑和放逐操纵的交互作用显著,即相比于控制组,低社交焦虑个体在遭到放逐后更愿意参与志愿活动,而这一组间差异在高社交焦虑个体中却没有出现。在与朋友交往和网络社交的社交兴趣上,放逐操纵和社交焦虑的主效应显著,但交互作用不显著,即与低社交焦虑个体相同,高社交焦虑个体在被放逐后对与好友旅行和使用网络交友也表现出更高的社交兴趣。结论:社交焦虑个体遭遇放逐后,在面对以陌生人为对象的潜在社交机会时,出现归属需求补偿缺失现象;而在潜在社交对象为朋友或通过网络时,没有出现补偿缺失现象。

Objective： The present study aimed to explore the relationship between social anxiety and reaction bias to- wards different types of potential social opportunities after suffering ostracism. Methods： 110 participants were divided in- to high-social-anxiety（HSA） or low-social-anxiety（LSA） group by scoring the top or bottom 20% in the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. They were also randomly assigned to ostracism group（58 participants） or control group（52 participants）, and then received ostracism or control manipulation via a Cyber-ball task. After the manipulation, participants were mea- sured by a manipulation check followed by Satisfaction of Basic Psychological Needs Scale, Modified Interest in Social Con- tact Questionnaire and Modified Compliance Request Task. Results： Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction be- tween SA and ostracism manipulation on volunteering time. LSA group, but not HSA, enrolled more volunteering time after ostracism than control group. Moreover, significant main effects for SA and ostracism manipulation were observed for social interest towards friends and communication online. Conclusion： After ostracism, HSA individuals show compensatory defi- cits when faced with potential social opportunities for interacting with strangers, but show no compensatory deficits when po- tential social opportunities are from friends or online.