期刊文献+

国际棉花期权与期货套保模型选择 被引量:3

International Cotton Options and Futures Hedging Model Selection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为改变期权领域德尔塔套保的单一模式,本文将二元GARCH模型和Copula-GARCH模型引入国际棉花期权与期货的套保。研究发现:二元GARCH(或Copula-GARCH)模型在最大均值方差比原则下效果不好,但在最小VaR原则下,无论是从方差角度还是均值、夏普比角度看都有效,因此,二元GARCH(或Copula-GARCH)-最小VaR模型可以作为德尔塔套保之外的一种可行方法。相比较套保比、均值和夏普比方面,德尔塔更具优势,方差方面Copula-GARCH更有优势,二元GARCH介于二者之间。因此,在运用国际棉花期权进行套保时,可以在风险较大时采用Copula-GARCH-最小VaR套保模型,风险适中时选择二元GARCH-最小VaR模型,风险小时采用德尔塔套保模型,灵活应对,力求在规避风险的同时谋求收益最大化。同时,在套保比动态调整中要重点关注期权的虚实变化和换月时点。 In order to change the single delta hedging method in the option field, the Bi-GARCH model and the Copula-GARCH model are introduced in international cotton options and futures hedging. It is found that the effect of neither the Bi-GARCH nor the Copula-GARCH model is good under the principle of the maximum mean variance ratio, but under the principle of the minimum VaR, whether it is from the angle of variance or mean, shaw ratio perspective is effective. Therefore, the Bi-GARCH (or the Copula-GARCH)-minimum VaR model can be a feasible method besides Delta hedging. By comparison, Delta has more advantages in the hedging ratio, mean and Sharpe ratio, Copula-GARCH has more advantages in the variance, while Bi-GARCH lies in between. Therefore, with the international cotton options on hedging, the Copula-GARCH-minimum VaR hedging model can be applied when the risk is larger, Bivariate GARCH hedging model can be applied when the risk is moderate, and the Delta hedging model can be applied when the risk is smaller, so as to seek maximize returns in risk aversion. At the same time, great importance should be attached to the option change in or out of the money and the change-point in the dynamic adjustment of hedging ratio.
作者 刘定国
出处 《经济与管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第3期61-71,共11页 Research on Economics and Management
关键词 国际棉花期权 套保原则 二元GARCH套保模型 Copula-GARCH套保模型 德尔塔套保模型 international cotton option hedging principle Bi-GARCH hedging model Copula-GARCH hedgingmodel Delta hedging model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献46

  • 1张燮译.线性统计推断及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1987..
  • 2Working H. Futures trading and hedging[J]. American Economic Review, 1962, 52.413-459.
  • 3Ramesh Sharda, Kathryn D Mudder. Financial futures hedging via goal programming [J]. Management Science, 19816, 8(32):933-946.
  • 4Cicheth P, Dale C, Vignola A. The usefulness of treasury bill futures as hedging instrument[J]. The Journal of Futures Markets, 1981, (1) :379-387.
  • 5Ederington L. The hedging performance of the new futures markets[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1979,34(1) :157- 170.
  • 6Hili J, Schneerwis T. Risk reduction potential of GNMA futures for issuers and holders of corporate bonds, Working Paper, University of Masschuserrs,Amherst, 1980.
  • 7Herbst A, Marshall J. Effectiveness, efficiency, and optimality in future hedging :an application of portfolio theory[M]. In the Swaps Handbook:Swaps and Relate Risk Management Instrument, Kapner K,Marshall J, New York, The New York Institute of Finance, 1990.
  • 8Ahn D, Boudoukh J, Richardson M, et al. Optimal risk management using option [J]. Journal of Finance, 1999, 54:359-376.
  • 9Brailsford T, Corrigan K, Heaney R. A comparison of measures of hedging effectiveness: a case study using the australian all ordinaries share price indesx futures contract[J]. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2001, 11 : 465- 481.
  • 10Donald Lien, Kit Pung Wong. Delivery risk and the hedging role of options[J]. The Journal of Futures Markets, 2002, 22 (4) : 339- 354.

共引文献119

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部