期刊文献+

农作物保险中农户道德风险的产生机理与案例检验——以内蒙古为例 被引量:18

A Study on the Mechanism and Case Testing of Farmer's Moral Hazard in Crop Insurance in Inner Mongolia
原文传递
导出
摘要 自2007年以来,我国农业保险实现跨越式发展,但其也面临诸多经营风险,例如投保农户的道德风险问题。本文以内蒙古农作物保险为例,界定投保农户道德风险的内涵与类别,分析其产生机理,结果发现:在内蒙古现行"低保障、广覆盖、低保费、低赔偿"的农作物保险政策下,投保农户并不存在事前消极防损和事后怠于减损的道德风险问题,而是存在事前骗保与事后骗赔等属于保险欺诈范畴的道德风险问题;建立健全保险机构在乡、村两级的保险服务体系则是减少农户保险欺诈的关键措施。 Since 2007, crop insurance in China has realized a leap - forward development, but there still exist some operating risks, such as insured farmers' moral hazard. This paper, taking crop insurance in Inner Mongolia as an example, defined the connotation and classification of farmers' moral hazard and analyzed its mechanism of origina- tion. The results showed that, in crop insurance market under the current policy of "low - protection, wide - cover- age, low -premium and low- indemnity" in Inner Mongolia,the insured farmer didn't exhibited a moral hazard in the form of a passive behavior to prevent loss ex ante or to mitigate loss ex post, but tend to conduct insurance frauds including fabricating insurance objects ex ante or deceitful insurance claims ex to establish and improve the rural insurance service network at the village and farmers' moral hazards.
作者 柴智慧 赵元凤 CHAI Zhihui ZHAO Yuanfeng(College of Economics and Management ,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University ,NeiMengGu Huhhot 010010)
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第12期85-93,共9页 Insurance Studies
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目"政府补贴农业保险的效果和效率的实证研究:以内蒙古农作物保险为例"(批准号:71503141)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 农作物保险 农户 道德风险 行为不积极 保险欺诈 crop insurance farmers moral hazard insurance fraud post. Therefore, it is a key measure township levels for reducing insured
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献28

  • 1Barry K. Goodwin, Problem with market insurance in agricuhure [ J ]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. , 83 (3) ( August 2001 ) :643 - 649.
  • 2Bruce A. Bobcock and Chad E. Hart, Influence of the premium subsidy on farmer's crop insurance coverage decisions, Working paper 05 - wp393, April, 2005. www. card. iastate, edu.
  • 3C. Edwin Young, Monte L. Vandeveer, Randall D. Schnepf, Production and price impacts of crop insurance programs[ J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. , Vol. 83, No. 5 (2001) : 1196 - 1203.
  • 4Chite, R. M. , Federal crop insurance: background and current issues, Congressional research service report No. 88 -739 ENR. December, 1988.
  • 5Coble, K. H., T. O, Knight, R. D. Pope, and J. R. Williams, An expected indemnity approach to the measurement of moral hazard in crop insurance [ J ]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. ,79 ( February, 1997) : 216 - 226.
  • 6Jerry R. Skees, Agricultural risk management or income enhancement[ JI ]. Regulation, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1999.
  • 7Joseph W. Glauber, Corp insurance reconsidered[ J ]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 86(5), (2004):1179-1195.
  • 8Ker, A. P. , Private insurance company involvement in the U.S. crop insurance program [ J ]. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49( 2001 ) :557 - 566.
  • 9Orden, D., Should There Be a Federal Income Safety Net? [ J]. Paper presented at the Agricultural Outlook Forum 2001, Washington, DC, February22, 2001.
  • 10Richard E. Just, Linda Calvin, and John Quggin, Adverse selection Ⅰ crop insurance: actuarial and asymmetric information incentives [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., Vol. 81, No. 4 (Nov. 1999):838-849.

共引文献134

同被引文献273

引证文献18

二级引证文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部