摘要
在对《资本论》阐述逻辑的解读中,比岱没有把作为理论开端的商品关系视为某种实在抽象,而是把它看成一种元结构式的现代虚构,并致力于从这个现代虚构之倒置的角度来剖析以剩余价值剥削为基础的资本主义阶级关系。这不仅使他获得了经济、政治、法律等多维度的解读视角,而且还使他能从资本的内在异化史中来梳理出其中所蕴含的解放理性。但这种解读方法也使他无法领悟马克思在《资本论》中所贯彻的基于内在矛盾运动的社会批判理论之方法论奥秘,从而使他与马克思在"罗陀斯岛"的"跳跃"节奏擦肩而过。
When interpreting the expository logic of Das Kapital, Bidet did not regard commodity relations of the theoretical beginning as a kind of real abstraction but as a meta-structural modern fiction. He endeavored to analyze capitalist class relations based on the exploitation of surplus value from the modern fictional inversion. This not only enabled him to obtain multi-dimensional perspective of interpretation of economics, politics, and law, but also enabled him to comb out the liberating rationality contained therein from the internal alienation history of capital. However, this interpretation also made him unable to comprehend the methodologies of Marx's theory of social criticism based on inner contradiction movement included in Das Kapital.
出处
《南京政治学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期29-34,共6页
Journal of PLA Nanjing Institute of Politics
基金
江苏省"333工程"资助项目"当代资本主义新变化对历史唯物主义的挑战及其回应"(苏人才办[2014]28号)