快播案犯罪构成及相关审判问题 从技术判断行为的进路

Constitution of Crime and Relevant Issue in Deciding the Case of QVOD In the Way of Judging Behavior by Technical Feature

快播案是网络犯罪与单位犯罪的结合,其所蕴含的技术行为(网络技术特征)在认定犯罪构成时处于争议的焦点,电子数据证据、刑罚适用标准等问题也都是本案面临的挑战。快播的传播行为,可分为帮助传输模式和参与传输模式,后者暗藏了快播公司对存储、分发热门"不法"视频的技术支持。快播的行为方式既有作为也有不作为,两种方式在不同层面同时发生、反复出现并集合为一个整体行为。产生这一现象的原因,在于大规模的P2P传播不是单一的行为举止,特定视频文件的传播行为被分散给了每一个参与者,将P2P网络中心服务器的提供者作为刑法意义上的行为人是打击类似网络犯罪唯一有效的选择。

The crime in the case of ＂ QVOD ＂ combines of cybercrime and unit crime. The technical behavior （network technology feature） is the focus of controversy in determining criminal constitution. The problems such as electronic evidence and applicable standard ofpenalty are also the challenges while deciding the case. The action of spread of the company can be classified into to two categories, assisting- mode and participating-mode. The latter means the secretly technical support of the company to store and distribute the popular ＂illegal＂ video. The behavior of ＂ QVOD ＂ includes action and inaction, which exists in different levels at the same time, occur frequently and combine into a criminal behavior as a whole. The reason we conclude the standard mentioned above which discerning the criminal behavior is that, every specific video-file users may participate in the dissemination in large-scale P2P communication and may not affix the responsibility due to the high-cost of investigation or charging, while treating the provider of P2P network center server as a perpetrator in the sense of criminal law may be the only effective choice to crack down the cybercrime like this case.