期刊文献+

比索洛尔治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效观察 被引量:1

Observe the Clinical Curative Effect of Bisoprolol in Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究比索洛尔对慢性心力衰竭治疗的临床效果。方法:2014年2月~2015年12月于我院接受治疗的100例慢性心力衰竭住院患者,随机分为对照组和观察组。对照组行常规抗心衰治疗;观察组在对照组基础上增加比索洛尔治疗。比较两组患者慢性心力衰竭缓解率、不良反应率、治疗前和治疗后患者LVEDV、LVESD、6 min步行距离、LVEF等心功能指标。结果:观察组相较于对照组慢性心力衰竭缓解率更高,P〈0.05;观察组、对照组不良反应均比较轻微,无严重不良反应发生,P〉0.05;治疗前两组LVEDV、LVESD、6 min步行距离、LVEF等心功能指标差异不明显,P〉0.05;治疗后观察组相较于对照组LVEDV、LVESD、6min步行距离、LVEF等心功能指标改善更显著,P〈0.05。结论:比索洛尔对慢性心力衰竭治疗的临床效果确切,可有效改善患者心衰症状,促进其心功能的改善,药物安全可靠,值得推广。 Objective: To study the clinical effect of bisoprolol in treatment of chronic heart failure. Methods: 100 Patients with chronic heart failure treated in our hospital from February 2014 to December 2015, were randomly divided into two groups: control group and observation group. The control group was received conventional anti heart failure treatment, based on the control group, the observation group was added bisoprolol. The chronic heart failure remission rate, adverse reaction rate, the LVEDV, LVESD, 6 min walking distance, LVEF before and after medication of two groups were compared. Results: Compared with the control group, the chronic heart failure remission rate of the observation group was higher (p〈 0.05). The adverse reactions of the two groups were relatively minor, and no serious adverse reaction happened (P〉0.05). Before the treatment, the LVEDV, LVESD, 6 min walking distance, LVEF of two groups were similar (P〉0.05); after the treatment, the LVEDV, LVESD, 6 min walking distance, LVEF of the observation group were better than the control group (p〈0.05). Conclusion: The bisoprolol treatment of chronic heart failure is effective, can effectively improve the symptoms of patients with heart failure, and improvement of cardiac function, and the drug is safe and reliable. It is worthy popularize.
作者 洪昊翔 HONG Hao-xiang(Minarets Street Community Health Service Centers, Guangzhou51 O180)
出处 《实用中西医结合临床》 2016年第11期74-75,共2页 Practical Clinical Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
关键词 慢性心力衰竭 比索洛尔 临床效果 Chronic heart failure Bisoprolol Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献75

  • 1赵存忠,刘积伦.比索洛尔治疗慢性心力衰竭远期疗效观察[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(9):2757-2759. 被引量:8
  • 2裴桃枝,孙平,肖红霞.β-受体阻滞剂结合常规药物治疗瓣膜性心脏病心衰的探讨[J].中国全科医学,2006,9(19):1627-1628. 被引量:3
  • 3中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组.慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2007修订版).中华结核和呼吸杂志,2007,30:817-817.
  • 4Braunstein JB,Anderson GF, Gerstenblith G,et al. Noncardiac co-morbidity ncreases preventable hospitalizations and mortality amongmedicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure [ J ]. J Am Coll Car-(^,2003,2:226-233.
  • 5Miller AB, Hoogstrate B, Staquet M. A winkler : Reporting Results ofCaneer Treatment [ J ] . Cancer, 1981,47 ,207.
  • 6Hilip MS, Samuel IW, Douglas HJ, et al. Effect of ^ blockers intreatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease : a retrospective co-hort study[J]. BMJ’ 2011,342: 1068-1071.
  • 7Chandy D, Aronow WS, Banach M. Current perepectives on treatmentof hypertensive patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Integrated Blood Pressure Control, 2013 , 6: 101-109.
  • 8Cullington D,Goode KM,Clark AL,et al. Heart rate achieved or beta-blocker dose in patients with chronic heart failure: which is the bettertarget? [ J]. European Journal of Heart Failure,2Q12,14(7) ; 737-747.
  • 9Jabbour A,Macdonald PS,Keogh AM,et al. Differences betweenbeta-blockers in patients with chronic heart failure and chronic ob-structive pulmonary diseasea randomized crossover trial[ J] . Journalof the American College of Cardiology, 2010,55(17) : 1780-1787.
  • 10Bestetti RB, Otaviano AP, Cardinalli-Neto A, et al. Effects of B-Blockers on outcome of patients with Chagas ’ cardiomyopathy withchronic heart failure [J] . International Journal of Cardiology, 2011,151(2): 205-208.

共引文献92

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部