期刊文献+

中国少数民族汉语水平考试(MHK)三级口试效标证据的Toulmin模型论证

Criterion Evidence of Toulmin's Argument Model for MHK Level 3 Oral Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立小型描述语语料库并参考MHK三级口试评分标准,对达到MHK三级水平的考生进行"能做什么"的描述分析,建立MHK三级口语能力评分量表。教师给出本班每位参加MHK三级口试学生的口语能力等级,以此为效标计算考生MHK口试成绩和教师评价间的相关等。将分析结果作为论证支撑(backing),以Toulmin效度论证模型为理论框架,从实证角度对少数民族汉语水平考试(MHK)的外推(extrapolation)阶段进行效度论证。结果显示:MHK三级口试效度论证的外推(extrapolation)阶段基本成立,考生的MHK三级口试成绩可以反映考生在实际汉语交际环境中口语能力的表现。 A small descriptive corpus is built based on 10 pieces of language ability rating scale. Depended on the standard scoring of MHK level 3 oral test and intuitive method,we will make a descriptive analysis of "what can they do"the examinees whose mandarin ability reach to MHK Level 3. In the third step,we will train the front- line teachers from a certain school of the scoring method and standard. After that,the trained teachers are required to give a rank( both whole ability rank and each single item rank) to every student in their classes of their oral ability based on the questionnaire. The assessment from teachers will be the criterion for calculating the correlation between examinees' score of MHK oral test and teacher's assessment. In the last step,the test validation of extrapolation state of MHK from empirical perspective would be done with the correlation result for backing and Toulmin 's Argument Model for framework. The results reveal that the test validation of extrapolation state of MHK level 3 is basically reasonable,the scores of examinees' in MHK level 3 oral test can reflect their oral performance in practical mandarin communication.
作者 张健 周成林 任杰 洪润 Zhang Jian Zhou Chenglin Ren Jie Hong Run(Beijing Language & Culture University, Beijing, 100083)
出处 《考试研究》 2017年第1期90-96,共7页 Examinations Research
基金 北京语言大学院级科研项目(中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助) 项目编号为"16YJ050005"
关键词 效度论证 MHK 口试 效标证据 Toulmin模型 Test Validation MHK Oral Test Criterion Evidence Toulmin's Argument Mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献59

  • 1杨惠中.大学英语口语考试设计原则[J].外语界,1999(3):48-57. 被引量:208
  • 2戴炜栋.构建具有中国特色的英语教学“一条龙”体系[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(5):322-327. 被引量:955
  • 3李清华.语言测试之效度理论发展五十年[J].现代外语,2006,29(1):87-95. 被引量:93
  • 4苏步青.学林散叶[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997:250.
  • 5Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 6Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Luorna, S. 2004. Assessing Speaking [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8North, B. 2000. The Development of a Common Framework Scale of Language Proficiency [M ]. New York: Peter Lang.
  • 9国家汉语国际推广领导小组办公室.汉语国际能力标准[S].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2007.
  • 10原鑫.高级水平汉语学习者听说读写四项技能的关系研究[D].北京语言大学硕士论文,2011.

共引文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部