超声雾化与氧气雾化吸入治疗AECOPD疗效比较

目的：探讨应用不同雾化方法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期（AECOPD）的临床效果。方法 AECOPD患者100例随机分为氧气雾化吸入治疗组（氧气组）和超声雾化吸入治疗组（超声组），2组药物治疗相同，对2组临床症状消失时间及治疗效果进行比较分析。结果超声组临床症状消失所需时间显著短于对照组；超声组治疗有效率95.33%，氧气组86.67%，超声组高于氧气组，差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论应用超声雾化吸入治疗AECOPD患者疗效显著，不良反应少，值得临床推广应用。

ObjectiveTo study the different atomization methods for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute aggravating period of clinical effect.MethodsPeriod,100 patients of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease（AECOPD） from the hospital were randomly divided into oxygen atomization inhalation treatment group（oxygen）and ultrasonic atomizing inhalation treatment group（ultrasound group）,two groups treatment,same for two groups of clinical symptoms disappear time,and to compare the effect analysis. Results The ultrasound group had a signifi cantly shorter time needed for clinical symptoms disappeared in the control group;Acoustic treatment group effective rate was 95.33%,86.67% oxygen group,with the ultrasound group higher than that of oxygen group,the difference had statistical signifi cance（P〈0.05）.Conclusion The application of ultrasonic atomization inhalation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases acute exacerbation period curative effect is distinct,less adverse reactions,worthy of clinical popularization and application.