我国土地流转信托实践模式比较研究

A Comparative Study on the Practice Model of Land Circulation Trust in China

目前我国几种典型的土地流转信托实践模式:宿州模式、桃园材模式、兰西模式和金色田野系列模式,比较这四种实践模式在信托产品结构、经营主体、风险控制和收益分配方面的异同,发现信托公司盈利方式尚未清晰,并且相关配套尚不健全。因此,政府应完善相关配套制度、完善农村土地流转服务平台,同时,信托公司应明晰经营模式,将土地经营权跟互联网模式联系起来,在条件成熟时,构建"土地信托银行",充分发挥土地的资本属性,为后续的金融创新提供可能。

At present, there are several typical patterns of land transfer Trust Practice in China： the Suzhou model, the Taoyuan village model, the Lanxi model and the golden field series.Comparing the similarities and differences between the four modes of practice in the trust product structure, the main business, risk control and income distribution, we found that the trust company＇s profit pattern is not clear, and the relevant supporting is not perfect.Therefore, the government should improve the relevant supporting system, improve the rural land transfer service platform;At the same time, the trust company should be clear business model, the land management rights linked with the Intemet model, when conditions are ripe, the construction of land trust bank＂ ,Give full play to the capital attributes of the land, to provide the possibility of financial innovation