期刊文献+

某院乳腺癌住院化疗病例医保费用分析 被引量:2

Analysis of the medical insurance cost of inpatients with breast cancer in a hospital
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过对某三甲肿瘤专科医院乳腺癌化疗费用的比较分析,对改进完善现行医疗保险制度提出意见建议。方法选取2014年1227例乳腺癌诊疗费用,分别按照不同的基础药物、病程、基因突变类型以及年龄段进行分类,对各项诊疗费用进行单项和综合比较。结果经比较分析,紫杉类为基础的化疗方案次均总费用为12558.52元,远高于蒽环类化疗方案的5986.85元;晚期方案的次均总费用14134.13,在不同病程对应的方案中最高,且其中自费药品占比最高,占49%;其他数据比较无明显差异。结果影响乳腺癌化疗诊疗费用的因素主要包括药品纳入医保报销目录的情况以及自费药品使用情况。应加强乳腺癌早期筛查,规范优化乳腺癌诊疗,适当扩大医保适应症范围和医保药品目录。 Objective to improve and perfect the existing medical insurance system by comparing and analyzing the cost of chemotherapy for breast cancer in a hospital. Methods 1227 cases of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment costs in 2014 were classified according to different basic medicine, course of disease, gene mutation and age. The results of the comparative analysis of taxane based chemotherapy costs are generally much higher type than those of anthracycline chemotherapy; advanced programs are the highest total costs, and the expense of drugs accounted for the highest; other data had no significant difference or no reference value. And then analyze the factors that affect the cost of chemotherapy and treatment of breast cancer include: the use of drugs into the Medicare reimbursement list and the use of drugs at their own expense. Conclusion to strengthen the early screening of breast cancer, standardize and optimize the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, expand the scope of medical insurance and medical insurance.
作者 韩杨 樊美娜
出处 《中国病案》 2017年第2期69-72,共4页 Chinese Medical Record
关键词 乳腺癌 化疗 医保费用 分析 Breast cancer chemotherapy Medical insurance cost analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1周笑颜,彭文青.抗肿瘤药物市场现状分析及其启示[J].医学信息(西安上半月),2007,20(9):1555-1559. 被引量:8
  • 2全国肿瘤登记中心.中国肿瘤登记工作指导手册[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2004.48-50.
  • 3赫捷,赵平,陈万青.2012年中国肿瘤登记年报[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2012.56-59.
  • 4中华人民共和国卫生部.2011年中国卫生统计年鉴[M/OL].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2011 (2013 - 01 - 16). ht-tp ://www. nhfpc. gov. cn/zwgkzt/tjnj/list. shtml.
  • 5MAUSKOPF J. Prevalence - based economic evaluation[ J]. Val-ue Health, 1998, 1(4) ; 251 -259.
  • 6BALTUSSEN R, LEIDL R,AMENT A. Real world designs in e-conomic evaluation. Bridging the gap between clinical research andpolicy - making [ J ] . Pharmacoeconomics , 1999,16(5) : 449 -458.
  • 7ANIS AH, GAGNON Y. Using economic evaluations to make for-mulary coverage decisions. So much for guidelines [ J ]. Pharmaco-economics ,2000, 18(1) : 55 -62.
  • 8TRUEMAN P,DRUMMOND M, HUTTON J. Developing guid-ance for budget impact analysis [ J ]. Pharmacoeconomics,2003,19(6) : 609 -621.
  • 9KOOPMANSCHAP MA, RUTTEN FF. The drug budget silomen-tality : the Dutch case [ J]. Value Health,2001,6 ( Suppl 1 ):S46 -S51.
  • 10刘国恩,胡善联,吴久鸿.中国药物经济学评价指南(2011版)[M].北京:中国药物经济学,2011.

共引文献874

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部