个别财产犯罪之贯彻

Implement of Individual Property Crime

"个别财产犯罪说"与"整体财产犯罪说"之争涉及"反对给付""损失转嫁""用途欺诈""诱价扣除"四个问题,司法实践对此立场不一。"个别财产犯罪说"与"整体财产犯罪说"应当将争议核心调整为"是否需要将损失纳入财产犯罪的构成要件当中",而不应当将"损失"概念进行泛化。形式的"个别财产犯罪说"符合我国的立法规定,将交易自治作为财产犯罪的保护法益符合时代需求,财产犯罪不以造成损失为要件的立场应当得到贯彻。

The dispute of individual property crime theory and individual property crime theory involves the problem of ＂against payment＂, ＂loss shifting＂, ＂fraudulent use＂ and ＂induced deduction＂, juridical practice has different positions. The core of the dispute of individual property crime theory and individual property crime theory should be adjusted to the question of ＂if there is need loss in components＂, but should not generalize the concept of ＂loss＂. individual property crime theory accords with the regulation of our country, taking transaction autonomy as the legal interest of property crimes accords with the needs of times. It should be carried out that loss is not necessary in the components of property crimes.